REVIEWING "REGENERATIVE BUILDING" CONTRIBUTIONS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST AND SET DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

A contemporary definition of regenerative building is "a built environment that strives to create positive environmental impacts that match or surpass those provided by ecosystems and native habitats".By 2025 this means using an understanding of the planetary boundaries of resource limits, when designing and constructing new buildings.And it means departing from a reduction approach to emissions."Regenerative building" is entering Europeans legislation and building sectors.So on this background this contributions asks: "What are the main characteristics of regenerative building (RB) and what will be the future direction of RB?" The paper uses Watson & Websters thematic reviewing, to review the extant literature on RB emerging since the 1990ties.This is well suited for the RB literature and designed to construct foresight.The review distinguishes between an early and a contemporary version.The early had it's source in architectural design of landscape and buildings.A qualitative discourse outlining overall goals for regeneration, practicing it mainly through single projects, claiming to realize RB.The contemporary version can be understood as a consequence of the Stockholm Resilience center's introduction of planetary boundaries for human activity.This adds a quantitative metric to the qualitative goal of regeneration.whichextends beyond the early RB approach.Looking into the future, two contributions with concrete proposals are reviewed.They both carry out a quantitative allocation of planetary boundaries into single projects.The review showed that "RB "is diversebut that is a possible source of constructive development.There is a challenge of combining qualitative and quantitative elements.The allocation method is a latent political conflict.The need for national decision making involves creating a balance between sociopolitical and scientific methods.Another worry would be the connection of the ambitions of RB and the needed acceleration towards EUs 2030 and 2050 goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22260/ccc2025/0072
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REVIEWING "REGENERATIVE BUILDING" CONTRIBUTIONS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST AND SET DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Christian Koch
BIM and Construction Integration
article

REVIEWING "REGENERATIVE BUILDING" CONTRIBUTIONS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST AND SET DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Christian Koch
article en

Abstract

A contemporary definition of regenerative building is "a built environment that strives to create positive environmental impacts that match or surpass those provided by ecosystems and native habitats".By 2025 this means using an understanding of the planetary boundaries of resource limits, when designing and constructing new buildings.And it means departing from a reduction approach to emissions."Regenerative building" is entering Europeans legislation and building sectors.So on this background this contributions asks: "What are the main characteristics of regenerative building (RB) and what will be the future direction of RB?" The paper uses Watson & Websters thematic reviewing, to review the extant literature on RB emerging since the 1990ties.This is well suited for the RB literature and designed to construct foresight.The review distinguishes between an early and a contemporary version.The early had it's source in architectural design of landscape and buildings.A qualitative discourse outlining overall goals for regeneration, practicing it mainly through single projects, claiming to realize RB.The contemporary version can be understood as a consequence of the Stockholm Resilience center's introduction of planetary boundaries for human activity.This adds a quantitative metric to the qualitative goal of regeneration.whichextends beyond the early RB approach.Looking into the future, two contributions with concrete proposals are reviewed.They both carry out a quantitative allocation of planetary boundaries into single projects.The review showed that "RB "is diversebut that is a possible source of constructive development.There is a challenge of combining qualitative and quantitative elements.The allocation method is a latent political conflict.The need for national decision making involves creating a balance between sociopolitical and scientific methods.Another worry would be the connection of the ambitions of RB and the needed acceleration towards EUs 2030 and 2050 goals.

University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

REVIEWING "REGENERATIVE BUILDING" CONTRIBUTIONS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST AND SET DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE — Christian Koch · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS