TOWARDS THE BEST CIRCULARITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR BUILDINGS

At present, it is commonly accepted that our economy requires to return to a circular system, similar to some pre-industrialized economies though, this time, rushed by environmental and social negative impacts, rather than economic constrains.After decades of circularity assessments of buildings, the construction sector still lacks specialized tools that allow agile assessment of architectural elements.Up to now, the related reviews indicate that life cycle assessment has been the most used methodology.This is probably because it was the closest tool to the topic.Nevertheless, at this moment there are many other circularity assessment approaches available, for instance the standard ISO 59020:2024, which defines a rigorous open methodology for any sector and combinable to other environmental assessment tools.There are also numerous tools specialized on buildings.Some allow agile evaluations such as the European framework for sustainable buildings Level(s).Others present a more case study point of view, like the Detail edition Manual of recycling, while many research papers develop particular methodologies.The present paper reviews these methods in order to draw initial conclusions for the future development of novel agile and rigorous circularity assessment tools for specific case studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22260/ccc2025/0082
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TOWARDS THE BEST CIRCULARITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR BUILDINGS

Oriol París Viviana, Paula Martin-Goñi, Oriol Pons-Valladares
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

TOWARDS THE BEST CIRCULARITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR BUILDINGS

Oriol París Viviana, Paula Martin-Goñi, Oriol Pons-Valladares
article en

Abstract

At present, it is commonly accepted that our economy requires to return to a circular system, similar to some pre-industrialized economies though, this time, rushed by environmental and social negative impacts, rather than economic constrains.After decades of circularity assessments of buildings, the construction sector still lacks specialized tools that allow agile assessment of architectural elements.Up to now, the related reviews indicate that life cycle assessment has been the most used methodology.This is probably because it was the closest tool to the topic.Nevertheless, at this moment there are many other circularity assessment approaches available, for instance the standard ISO 59020:2024, which defines a rigorous open methodology for any sector and combinable to other environmental assessment tools.There are also numerous tools specialized on buildings.Some allow agile evaluations such as the European framework for sustainable buildings Level(s).Others present a more case study point of view, like the Detail edition Manual of recycling, while many research papers develop particular methodologies.The present paper reviews these methods in order to draw initial conclusions for the future development of novel agile and rigorous circularity assessment tools for specific case studies.

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

TOWARDS THE BEST CIRCULARITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR BUILDINGS — Oriol París Viviana, Paula Martin-Goñi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS