Impact of Residue Retention on Methane Flux in a Maize-Chickpea Cropping System in Tropical Vertisols of Central India

A field experiment on methane cycling under different crop residue retention in a maize-chickpea cropping system was conducted during the kharif-rabi seasons (2022-2024) at the research farm of the Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal (M.P.). The study aimed to evaluate methane consumption and production potential in soil under different crop residue incorporation levels and to assess the microbial communities associated with methane cycling. The experiment was designed in a RBD with five replicates, two tillage practices (conventional tillage and no-tillage), three crop residue retention levels (0%, 30%, and 90%), and two soil depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm). The four treatments included : T1 (0% residue retention), T2 (30% residue retention), T3 (90% residue retention), and T4 (conventional tillage for comparison with different residue levels). The findings from this study provided insightful information on sustainable residue management practices for improving soil health, enhancing microbial activity, and mitigating methane emissions under conservation agriculture in Vertisols of Central India. In maize crop, rates of CH4 consumption (CH4 consumed g/soil/day) varied from 2.00 to 4.49 in 0-15 cm and 0.74 to 2.06 in 15-30 cm. CH₄ consumption was higher in maize, particularly in the upper soil surface, while chickpea contributed to CH4 uptake but to a lesser extent. CH4 production rate ranged from 0.11 to 0.13 ng CH4 produced g/soil/day and 0.008 to 0.014 ng CH4 produced g/soil/day soil in maize and chickpea. There was no significant difference among the treatments of depth. Abundance of microbial groups belonging to methanotrophs and methanogens were estimated by real time PCR targeting genes of methanotrophs (pmoA) and methanogens (mcr) genes. Abundance was represented as gene copies g−1 soil. Results indicated that the microbial genes were significantly highest in 90% residue retention in maize crop due to the amendment by chickpea crop residues. Overall, Organic carbon and β-glucosidase activity was slightly higher in chickpea crops compared to maize, likely due to the greater microbial support provided by legumes, which enhance soil biological activity. The study highlights that crop residues retention influences both CH4 consumption and production potential of soil and this effect is more pronounced with higher residue than conventional tillage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i84977
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Residue Retention on Methane Flux in a Maize-Chickpea Cropping System in Tropical Vertisols of Central India

Santosh Ranjan Mohanty, BHARAT PRAKASH MEENA, Bharati Kollah, Sudhir Kumar Trivedi et al.
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Impact of Residue Retention on Methane Flux in a Maize-Chickpea Cropping System in Tropical Vertisols of Central India

Santosh Ranjan Mohanty, BHARAT PRAKASH MEENA, Bharati Kollah, Sudhir Kumar Trivedi, Komal Agrawal, Shashi S. Yadav, Raghavendra Narwariya
article en

Abstract

A field experiment on methane cycling under different crop residue retention in a maize-chickpea cropping system was conducted during the kharif-rabi seasons (2022-2024) at the research farm of the Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal (M.P.). The study aimed to evaluate methane consumption and production potential in soil under different crop residue incorporation levels and to assess the microbial communities associated with methane cycling. The experiment was designed in a RBD with five replicates, two tillage practices (conventional tillage and no-tillage), three crop residue retention levels (0%, 30%, and 90%), and two soil depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm). The four treatments included : T1 (0% residue retention), T2 (30% residue retention), T3 (90% residue retention), and T4 (conventional tillage for comparison with different residue levels). The findings from this study provided insightful information on sustainable residue management practices for improving soil health, enhancing microbial activity, and mitigating methane emissions under conservation agriculture in Vertisols of Central India. In maize crop, rates of CH4 consumption (CH4 consumed g/soil/day) varied from 2.00 to 4.49 in 0-15 cm and 0.74 to 2.06 in 15-30 cm. CH₄ consumption was higher in maize, particularly in the upper soil surface, while chickpea contributed to CH4 uptake but to a lesser extent. CH4 production rate ranged from 0.11 to 0.13 ng CH4 produced g/soil/day and 0.008 to 0.014 ng CH4 produced g/soil/day soil in maize and chickpea. There was no significant difference among the treatments of depth. Abundance of microbial groups belonging to methanotrophs and methanogens were estimated by real time PCR targeting genes of methanotrophs (pmoA) and methanogens (mcr) genes. Abundance was represented as gene copies g−1 soil. Results indicated that the microbial genes were significantly highest in 90% residue retention in maize crop due to the amendment by chickpea crop residues. Overall, Organic carbon and β-glucosidase activity was slightly higher in chickpea crops compared to maize, likely due to the greater microbial support provided by legumes, which enhance soil biological activity. The study highlights that crop residues retention influences both CH4 consumption and production potential of soil and this effect is more pronounced with higher residue than conventional tillage.

International Journal of Environment and Climate ChangeVol. 15(8)
Indian Institute of Soil Science (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.