Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices

ABSTRACT People often make decisions by either choosing an alternative they like ( choose mode) or rejecting alternatives they dislike ( reject mode). Previous research has demonstrated that these two decision modes involve distinct cognitive processes. In the current work, we further investigate whether these distinct cognitive processes in these two decision modes symmetrically or asymmetrically impact people's subsequent preferences for their preferred (chosen or nonrejected) alternatives. Across three experiments involving consumer goods, we found that participants exhibited stronger preferences for items preferred through the choose mode compared with items preferred through the reject mode. Using eye tracking, we demonstrate that this effect can be explained by more selective visual attention directed toward task‐compatible alternatives in choosing versus rejecting decisions. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice in the context of consumer preferences, as well as their extensions to other decision domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70032
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices

Sangsuk Yoon, Vinod Venkatraman
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices

Sangsuk Yoon, Vinod Venkatraman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT People often make decisions by either choosing an alternative they like ( choose mode) or rejecting alternatives they dislike ( reject mode). Previous research has demonstrated that these two decision modes involve distinct cognitive processes. In the current work, we further investigate whether these distinct cognitive processes in these two decision modes symmetrically or asymmetrically impact people's subsequent preferences for their preferred (chosen or nonrejected) alternatives. Across three experiments involving consumer goods, we found that participants exhibited stronger preferences for items preferred through the choose mode compared with items preferred through the reject mode. Using eye tracking, we demonstrate that this effect can be explained by more selective visual attention directed toward task‐compatible alternatives in choosing versus rejecting decisions. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice in the context of consumer preferences, as well as their extensions to other decision domains.

Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingVol. 38(4)
University of Dayton (US), Temple University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices — Sangsuk Yoon, Vinod Venkatraman · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS