Assessing L2 Regulatory Mode Scales in Chinese Undergraduate Students

Motivation is a key predictor of students’ cognitive manifestations, emotional responses to success/failure, and behaviour in second language acquisition (SLA or L2). These aspects are directed by two important motivation systems: assessment and locomotion. The two motivation constructs in SLA, measured by Regulatory mode scales (RMS, Teimouri et al., 2022), have been validated by in Iran for Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. However, it is not clear whether the RMS scales are able to provide the reliability and validity of the two constructs applying to samples from a different culture (e.g., China) and respond to the questionnaire in a different language (i.e., Chinese). To bridge the gap, this study investigated a sample of Chinese undergraduate students who responded to a Chinese version of RMS. Results showed that a Chinese version of the English questionnaire was appropriate for ensuring the validity and reliability of the measure when administering this questionnaire to this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociology and Education
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63887/jse.2025.1.4.6
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing L2 Regulatory Mode Scales in Chinese Undergraduate Students

Min Wang
Journal of Sociology and Education
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Assessing L2 Regulatory Mode Scales in Chinese Undergraduate Students

Min Wang
article en

Abstract

Motivation is a key predictor of students’ cognitive manifestations, emotional responses to success/failure, and behaviour in second language acquisition (SLA or L2). These aspects are directed by two important motivation systems: assessment and locomotion. The two motivation constructs in SLA, measured by Regulatory mode scales (RMS, Teimouri et al., 2022), have been validated by in Iran for Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. However, it is not clear whether the RMS scales are able to provide the reliability and validity of the two constructs applying to samples from a different culture (e.g., China) and respond to the questionnaire in a different language (i.e., Chinese). To bridge the gap, this study investigated a sample of Chinese undergraduate students who responded to a Chinese version of RMS. Results showed that a Chinese version of the English questionnaire was appropriate for ensuring the validity and reliability of the measure when administering this questionnaire to this population.

Journal of Sociology and EducationVol. 1(4)
Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.