Associations between adherence to the Eatwell Guide and risk of self-reported periodontal disease: An analysis of the UK Biobank prospective cohort study

Periodontal disease has significant negative effects on the health and lives of people worldwide, including chronic pain, eating difficulties, social anxiety, economic costs of treatment, and lost productivity (1) . Diet is an influential factor in managing periodontal disease (2) . However, it is currently unclear whether following UK healthy eating recommendations outlined in the Eatwell Guide (EWG), which is a reference used in public health initiatives and clinical practice in the UK (3) , is associated with risk of periodontal disease. To address this knowledge gap, this study examined cross-sectional and prospective associations between adherence to the EWG and the risk of periodontal disease. This study was conducted using data from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. EWG adherence scores were created using dietary data from 24-hour dietary questionnaires (Oxford WebQ). Participants were awarded points between 0–5 reflecting the extent to which they adhered to each of the 12 healthy eating recommendations outlined in the EWG (total score range: 0-60). Periodontal disease risk markers were assessed using self-reported oral health questionnaires. Logistic regression models were used to examine cross-sectional associations between levels of EWG adherence (low, medium and high) and odds of periodontal disease. Generalised estimating equations were used to analyse prospective associations. Analyses were adjusted for relevant covariates. Cross-sectional analyses involving 158,899 participants showed significant associations between higher (odds ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)]: 0.876 [0.848–0.906]) and moderate (OR [95% CI]: 0.958 [0.927–0.989]) adherence to the EWG and lower odds of periodontal disease versus the low-adherence reference group. These results were consistent with prospective analyses (higher adherence: OR [95% CI]: 0.861 [0.834–0.888]; moderate adherence: 0.943 [0.914–0.973]). Results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. Following UK-specific healthy eating recommendations, as outlined in the Eatwell Guide, could help lower the risk of periodontal disease. These findings warrant substantiation in future randomised controlled trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665125100797
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between adherence to the Eatwell Guide and risk of self-reported periodontal disease: An analysis of the UK Biobank prospective cohort study

Fiona C. Malcomson, Neil Ward, Amy Jennings, Sarah Gregory et al.
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Associations between adherence to the Eatwell Guide and risk of self-reported periodontal disease: An analysis of the UK Biobank prospective cohort study

Fiona C. Malcomson, Neil Ward, Amy Jennings, Sarah Gregory, Jamie Matu, A. Fairley, Alex Griffiths, Alexander Watson, Shatha Alhulaefi, SE Ramsay, OM Shannon, R. Townsend
article en

Abstract

Periodontal disease has significant negative effects on the health and lives of people worldwide, including chronic pain, eating difficulties, social anxiety, economic costs of treatment, and lost productivity (1) . Diet is an influential factor in managing periodontal disease (2) . However, it is currently unclear whether following UK healthy eating recommendations outlined in the Eatwell Guide (EWG), which is a reference used in public health initiatives and clinical practice in the UK (3) , is associated with risk of periodontal disease. To address this knowledge gap, this study examined cross-sectional and prospective associations between adherence to the EWG and the risk of periodontal disease. This study was conducted using data from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. EWG adherence scores were created using dietary data from 24-hour dietary questionnaires (Oxford WebQ). Participants were awarded points between 0–5 reflecting the extent to which they adhered to each of the 12 healthy eating recommendations outlined in the EWG (total score range: 0-60). Periodontal disease risk markers were assessed using self-reported oral health questionnaires. Logistic regression models were used to examine cross-sectional associations between levels of EWG adherence (low, medium and high) and odds of periodontal disease. Generalised estimating equations were used to analyse prospective associations. Analyses were adjusted for relevant covariates. Cross-sectional analyses involving 158,899 participants showed significant associations between higher (odds ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)]: 0.876 [0.848–0.906]) and moderate (OR [95% CI]: 0.958 [0.927–0.989]) adherence to the EWG and lower odds of periodontal disease versus the low-adherence reference group. These results were consistent with prospective analyses (higher adherence: OR [95% CI]: 0.861 [0.834–0.888]; moderate adherence: 0.943 [0.914–0.973]). Results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. Following UK-specific healthy eating recommendations, as outlined in the Eatwell Guide, could help lower the risk of periodontal disease. These findings warrant substantiation in future randomised controlled trials.

Proceedings of The Nutrition SocietyVol. 84(OCE3)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Taif University (SA), Queens University (BD), Leeds Beckett University (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.