Fusion Power Sensitivity Analysis and Thermodynamic Cycle Selection

Abstract Fusion energy presents a promising alternative solution for the energy transition, with a huge amount of heat being generated across the tokamak. Unique to fusion, though, is the significant loads, with a key part of this being to drive current in the plasma and cool the magnets to cryogenic temperatures. This, coupled with the energy lost in the thermodynamic cycle and other smaller losses, such as those to power the fuel cycle, will determine the net energy produced by a fusion plant. This paper seeks to outline the current understanding of these loads, and highlight the workflow and trade-off required in the system particularly around materials choices and so-called breeder blankets, which drive much of the thermal energy capture. The technology choice for breeder blanket often focuses on its function as a fuel breeding module to enable self-sufficiency, while here this selection is viewed instead from the lens of the power generation system. Blanket technology that enables compatibility with preferred materials and temperature for the thermodynamic cycle of choice is outlined with optimising for this aspect in part being at odds with other functions of this blanket technology. The trade-off space is then explored, with potential options for navigating it outlined. This paper reviews several thermodynamic cycle solutions, highlighting the relative merits of different approaches to integrating power generation within a fusion power plant conceptual design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-153313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fusion Power Sensitivity Analysis and Thermodynamic Cycle Selection

Christopher F. Clements, Yuin‐Han Loh, Emre Yildirim
1 citations
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
article

Fusion Power Sensitivity Analysis and Thermodynamic Cycle Selection

Christopher F. Clements, Yuin‐Han Loh, Emre Yildirim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fusion energy presents a promising alternative solution for the energy transition, with a huge amount of heat being generated across the tokamak. Unique to fusion, though, is the significant loads, with a key part of this being to drive current in the plasma and cool the magnets to cryogenic temperatures. This, coupled with the energy lost in the thermodynamic cycle and other smaller losses, such as those to power the fuel cycle, will determine the net energy produced by a fusion plant. This paper seeks to outline the current understanding of these loads, and highlight the workflow and trade-off required in the system particularly around materials choices and so-called breeder blankets, which drive much of the thermal energy capture. The technology choice for breeder blanket often focuses on its function as a fuel breeding module to enable self-sufficiency, while here this selection is viewed instead from the lens of the power generation system. Blanket technology that enables compatibility with preferred materials and temperature for the thermodynamic cycle of choice is outlined with optimising for this aspect in part being at odds with other functions of this blanket technology. The trade-off space is then explored, with potential options for navigating it outlined. This paper reviews several thermodynamic cycle solutions, highlighting the relative merits of different approaches to integrating power generation within a fusion power plant conceptual design.

Tokamak Energy (United Kingdom) (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.