Use of Performance Models for Powerplant Performance Testing

Abstract This paper shows that a thermodynamic performance model corrects test measurements more accurately than the customary correction curves. Traditional correction procedures use polynomial correction curves derived from various types of performance models. This paper compares the traditional polynomial correction curve-based approach against the direct use of a performance model for one composite correction factor for each performance indicator (power, heat rate, etc.). In addition, the paper demonstrates how the direct use of a performance model facilities the estimation of test result uncertainty, using Monte Carlo methods. The paper is based on ASME’s most recent Performance Test Code, PTC53-2022 for Mechanical and Thermal Energy Storage Systems, which permits the use of a performance model for correcting test results. Non-mandatory appendix A of PTC-53-2022 illustrates the customary approach of using correction curves for correcting performance of an Energy Storage Combined Cycle, where thermal energy storage is coupled with gas turbine exhaust heat. A performance model can aid the performance testing process by more accurately correcting test measurements for variations from the design or guarantee point and by preparing a stochastic ‘uncertainty cloud’ based on the uncertainty of the primary instruments used to correct the measured performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-151178
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Performance Models for Powerplant Performance Testing

Milton Venetos, Peter Pechtl, William M. Conlon
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Use of Performance Models for Powerplant Performance Testing

Milton Venetos, Peter Pechtl, William M. Conlon
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper shows that a thermodynamic performance model corrects test measurements more accurately than the customary correction curves. Traditional correction procedures use polynomial correction curves derived from various types of performance models. This paper compares the traditional polynomial correction curve-based approach against the direct use of a performance model for one composite correction factor for each performance indicator (power, heat rate, etc.). In addition, the paper demonstrates how the direct use of a performance model facilities the estimation of test result uncertainty, using Monte Carlo methods. The paper is based on ASME’s most recent Performance Test Code, PTC53-2022 for Mechanical and Thermal Energy Storage Systems, which permits the use of a performance model for correcting test results. Non-mandatory appendix A of PTC-53-2022 illustrates the customary approach of using correction curves for correcting performance of an Energy Storage Combined Cycle, where thermal energy storage is coupled with gas turbine exhaust heat. A performance model can aid the performance testing process by more accurately correcting test measurements for variations from the design or guarantee point and by preparing a stochastic ‘uncertainty cloud’ based on the uncertainty of the primary instruments used to correct the measured performance.

ET Enterprises (United Kingdom) (GB), Flex (Germany) (DE), Institute of Power Engineering (PL), Wyatt Technology (China) (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.