Elevated Mainstream Mach Number Effects on Shaped Gas Turbine Film Cooling Holes

Abstract Compressible flow fields associated with engine realistic high-speed conditions can have a significant impact on the performance of shaped film cooling holes in gas turbines. Such flow fields are dependent upon a variety of parameters, notably the stagnation temperature ratio, an analog to density ratio, and the mainstream Mach number. In previous high-speed computations using 7-7-7 shaped hole geometry, cases with higher stagnation temperature ratio performed significantly worse than those with lower stagnation temperature ratio, at the same blowing ratios. The same computational work, in addition to a preliminary experimental study, demonstrated that 7-7-7 cases with elevated mainstream Mach number perform significantly worse than those with low mainstream Mach number. In the present study, experiments were performed with 7-7-7 shaped film cooling holes across a wide range of conditions. Stagnation temperature ratio was varied from 0.6–0.8, and mainstream Mach number was varied from 0.15–0.50. The results confirmed that stagnation temperature ratio has a significant impact on performance at high speeds, with higher performance occurring at lower stagnation temperature ratio, or by proxy higher density ratio. Furthermore, cases with elevated mainstream Mach number performed significantly worse than those with low mainstream Mach number. For all cases, performance was scaled with both blowing ratio and pressure ratio, and the implications of such scaling are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-154302
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevated Mainstream Mach Number Effects on Shaped Gas Turbine Film Cooling Holes

David G. Bogard, Michael T. Furgeson, Elise M. Flachs
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
article

Elevated Mainstream Mach Number Effects on Shaped Gas Turbine Film Cooling Holes

David G. Bogard, Michael T. Furgeson, Elise M. Flachs
article en

Abstract

Abstract Compressible flow fields associated with engine realistic high-speed conditions can have a significant impact on the performance of shaped film cooling holes in gas turbines. Such flow fields are dependent upon a variety of parameters, notably the stagnation temperature ratio, an analog to density ratio, and the mainstream Mach number. In previous high-speed computations using 7-7-7 shaped hole geometry, cases with higher stagnation temperature ratio performed significantly worse than those with lower stagnation temperature ratio, at the same blowing ratios. The same computational work, in addition to a preliminary experimental study, demonstrated that 7-7-7 cases with elevated mainstream Mach number perform significantly worse than those with low mainstream Mach number. In the present study, experiments were performed with 7-7-7 shaped film cooling holes across a wide range of conditions. Stagnation temperature ratio was varied from 0.6–0.8, and mainstream Mach number was varied from 0.15–0.50. The results confirmed that stagnation temperature ratio has a significant impact on performance at high speeds, with higher performance occurring at lower stagnation temperature ratio, or by proxy higher density ratio. Furthermore, cases with elevated mainstream Mach number performed significantly worse than those with low mainstream Mach number. For all cases, performance was scaled with both blowing ratio and pressure ratio, and the implications of such scaling are discussed.

The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.