Assessment of a New 0.2 Hub-to-Tip Ratio Propeller Fan Design With Rigid-Body Blade Loading
Abstract This paper presents the numerical assessment of a new 0.2 hub-to-tip ratio propeller with specific speed equal to 8.2, by means of an original low-order CFD modelling approach. The new fan implements the rigid body blade loading distribution and it was designed by the authors using the classical “Kahane-Wallis” method. First aim of the work is to give a preliminary feedback on the possibility that the new fan improves the aerodynamic performance of a high efficiency fan designed by the authors in a previous work, which implements the constant-swirl blade loading distribution. Second aim of the work is to verify the effectiveness of the “Kahane-Wallis” method for the design of very low hub-to-tip ratio fan rotors with rigid-body blade loading distribution. The third aim is to present the new low-order CFD modelling approach that the authors conceived for a low-computational-cost preliminary estimate of the aerodynamic performance expected from ISO 5801 Type-A performance tests. The results demonstrated that the “Kahane-Wallis” method allows for rigid-body designs with very low hub-to-tip ratio and pressure coefficients remarkably high. Such designs unlikely exceed the efficiency achieved by constant-swirl designs at the expense of lower pressure coefficients. Moreover, the successful application of the method is doubtful for designs with flow separation at the blade root or immediately downstream of the rotor. Finally, it is found that the new low-order CFD approach offers potentialities as a tool for the support of the preliminary fan design and deserves future investigations.
Authors
- Piero Danieli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-6702)
- Massimo Masi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-097X)
Institutions
- University of Padua (IT)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-154208
- Primary Topic
- Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00