An Assessment of Algebraic and Differential Reynolds-Stress Models for a Highly-Bent Serpentine Aircraft Intake

Abstract Serpentine ducts are commonly used as intakes for modern low-bypass aero-engines, drawing atmospheric air through to the aero-engine compressor. Because of their highly-bent geometry, serpentine ducts develop significant unsteady flow features that can, in turn, cause compressor instabilities. Quantifying the performance of a coupled intake-compressor system requires analysis of a large parameter space, which is typically undertaken with (U)RANS calculations based on linear eddy-viscosity models. In the present work, we study a highly-bent serpentine intake with three classes of turbulence model, and assess the intake as a turbulence modelling benchmark. A comparison is made between a linear eddy-viscosity model (k-ω SST with curvature correction), an explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model (Wallin & Johansson, 2000 with curvature correction), and a differential Reynolds-stress model (the elliptic blending model of Manceau & Hanjalić, 2002). Comparisons are made between experimental wall pressure measurements and URANS calculations along the centreline, and radial cross-sections of the intake. Detailed analysis is undertaken in critical near-wall regions of the intake. Finally, based on the outcomes of the flow physics analysis, future modelling opportunities are discussed for algebraic and differential Reynolds-stress models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-151860
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Assessment of Algebraic and Differential Reynolds-Stress Models for a Highly-Bent Serpentine Aircraft Intake

Richard D. Sandberg, Marcel Stößel, Andreas Grois, Melissa Kožul et al.
1 citations
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
4.99
article

An Assessment of Algebraic and Differential Reynolds-Stress Models for a Highly-Bent Serpentine Aircraft Intake

Richard D. Sandberg, Marcel Stößel, Andreas Grois, Melissa Kožul, Suad Jakirlić, Dragan Kožulović, Sean K. Hanrahan, Julian A. Scheibel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Serpentine ducts are commonly used as intakes for modern low-bypass aero-engines, drawing atmospheric air through to the aero-engine compressor. Because of their highly-bent geometry, serpentine ducts develop significant unsteady flow features that can, in turn, cause compressor instabilities. Quantifying the performance of a coupled intake-compressor system requires analysis of a large parameter space, which is typically undertaken with (U)RANS calculations based on linear eddy-viscosity models. In the present work, we study a highly-bent serpentine intake with three classes of turbulence model, and assess the intake as a turbulence modelling benchmark. A comparison is made between a linear eddy-viscosity model (k-ω SST with curvature correction), an explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model (Wallin & Johansson, 2000 with curvature correction), and a differential Reynolds-stress model (the elliptic blending model of Manceau & Hanjalić, 2002). Comparisons are made between experimental wall pressure measurements and URANS calculations along the centreline, and radial cross-sections of the intake. Detailed analysis is undertaken in critical near-wall regions of the intake. Finally, based on the outcomes of the flow physics analysis, future modelling opportunities are discussed for algebraic and differential Reynolds-stress models.

The University of Melbourne (AU), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.