Algorithm Based Generation of Realistic Bristle Distribution: Comparison Between an Unstructured and a Structured Bristle Package for Brush Seal Simulation

Abstract Reducing the leakage in aero engines offers a high potential for efficiency improvements and fuel savings in air transport. Brush seals are able to significantly reduce leakage in comparison to the predominantly used labyrinth seals, but their application in gas turbines is restricted by the limited ability to predict their in-service behavior and leakage rates. This work contributes to enhancing brush seal simulations and improving their predictive accuracy. With the use of image processing algorithms, microscope images from a brush seal test stand are evaluated and individual bristles identified. A statistical analysis on these images determines the distribution of bristles in the bristle package. For pressure differences from 0 to 5 bar across the seal, representative unstructured bristle distributions can then be generated and used as input for CFD simulations. In the simulations, the unstructured bristle package is compared with a structured bristle setup using the same mean inter-bristle distance. The comparison is conducted in 2D as well as 3D. The 3D geometry includes a part of the support ring with a fence height of 0.5 mm and contact between bristles and rotor surface. Simulations with an unstructured bristle package show good agreement with experimental findings. The comparison with a structured bristle package reveals significant differences, when the inter-bristle distance is not varied to fit experimental leakage data. This shows the importance of simulating brush seals using a realistic bristle distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-151207
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithm Based Generation of Realistic Bristle Distribution: Comparison Between an Unstructured and a Structured Bristle Package for Brush Seal Simulation

Johann Göttler, François Cottier, Marcus Meyer, Moritz Ursprung et al.
1 links
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
article

Algorithm Based Generation of Realistic Bristle Distribution: Comparison Between an Unstructured and a Structured Bristle Package for Brush Seal Simulation

Johann Göttler, François Cottier, Marcus Meyer, Moritz Ursprung, Simon Hausruckinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reducing the leakage in aero engines offers a high potential for efficiency improvements and fuel savings in air transport. Brush seals are able to significantly reduce leakage in comparison to the predominantly used labyrinth seals, but their application in gas turbines is restricted by the limited ability to predict their in-service behavior and leakage rates. This work contributes to enhancing brush seal simulations and improving their predictive accuracy. With the use of image processing algorithms, microscope images from a brush seal test stand are evaluated and individual bristles identified. A statistical analysis on these images determines the distribution of bristles in the bristle package. For pressure differences from 0 to 5 bar across the seal, representative unstructured bristle distributions can then be generated and used as input for CFD simulations. In the simulations, the unstructured bristle package is compared with a structured bristle setup using the same mean inter-bristle distance. The comparison is conducted in 2D as well as 3D. The 3D geometry includes a part of the support ring with a fence height of 0.5 mm and contact between bristles and rotor surface. Simulations with an unstructured bristle package show good agreement with experimental findings. The comparison with a structured bristle package reveals significant differences, when the inter-bristle distance is not varied to fit experimental leakage data. This shows the importance of simulating brush seals using a realistic bristle distribution.

Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), MTU Aero Engines (Germany) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.