Automatic classification of vocal intensity categories from amplitude-normalized speech signals by comparing acoustic features and classifier models

Regulation of vocal intensity is a fundamental phenomenon in speech communication. Speakers use different intensity categories (e.g., soft, normal, and loud voice) to generate different vocal emotions or to communicate in noisy conditions or over varying distances. Vocal intensity categories have been studied in fundamental research of speech, but much less is known about their automatic classification. This study investigates the classification of vocal intensity categories from speech signals in a scenario, where the original level information of speech is absent and the signal is presented on a normalized amplitude scale. Different acoustic features were studied together with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) classifiers using two different labeling approaches. Speech signals recorded from 50 speakers reciting sentences in four intensity categories (soft, normal, loud, and very loud) were analyzed. Altogether 15 feature sets including different cepstral, spectral and handcrafted (eGeMAPS) features were compared. Three ML classifiers (support vector machine, random forest and AdaBoost), and four DL classifiers (deep neural network, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network and bidirectional long short-term memory network) were compared. The best classification accuracy of 86.0% was obtained by combining the best performing cepstral and spectral features and using the bidirectional long short-term memory classifier. • Multi-class classification of vocal intensity categories is studied. • The classification is studied using amplitude-normalized speech signals. • Various labelling approaches, features and classifiers are compared. • DL models outperformed ML models, with BiLSTM achieving the best performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Speech Communication
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2025.103288
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic classification of vocal intensity categories from amplitude-normalized speech signals by comparing acoustic features and classifier models

Manila Kodali, Paavo Alku, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Luna Ansari et al.
1 citations
Speech Communication
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
article

Automatic classification of vocal intensity categories from amplitude-normalized speech signals by comparing acoustic features and classifier models

Manila Kodali, Paavo Alku, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Luna Ansari, Shrikanth Narayanan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Regulation of vocal intensity is a fundamental phenomenon in speech communication. Speakers use different intensity categories (e.g., soft, normal, and loud voice) to generate different vocal emotions or to communicate in noisy conditions or over varying distances. Vocal intensity categories have been studied in fundamental research of speech, but much less is known about their automatic classification. This study investigates the classification of vocal intensity categories from speech signals in a scenario, where the original level information of speech is absent and the signal is presented on a normalized amplitude scale. Different acoustic features were studied together with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) classifiers using two different labeling approaches. Speech signals recorded from 50 speakers reciting sentences in four intensity categories (soft, normal, loud, and very loud) were analyzed. Altogether 15 feature sets including different cepstral, spectral and handcrafted (eGeMAPS) features were compared. Three ML classifiers (support vector machine, random forest and AdaBoost), and four DL classifiers (deep neural network, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network and bidirectional long short-term memory network) were compared. The best classification accuracy of 86.0% was obtained by combining the best performing cepstral and spectral features and using the bidirectional long short-term memory classifier. • Multi-class classification of vocal intensity categories is studied. • The classification is studied using amplitude-normalized speech signals. • Various labelling approaches, features and classifiers are compared. • DL models outperformed ML models, with BiLSTM achieving the best performance.

Speech CommunicationVol. 174
University of Southern California (US), Aalto University (FI)
Academy of Finland, Aalto-Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.