CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FMEAS

Quality failures can be costly to an organization.To avoid failures, organizations perform a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for both the design of a product, and the manufacturing and assembly processes that create the product.However, there is a lack of assessment criteria for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.The approach used is design methods, which consist of exploration of a problem, solution creation, solution evaluation, and communication of the solution.Literature was explored to understand what is required for performing a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and assessment criteria were developed.The assessment criteria were then evaluated using a case study consisting of applying the criteria to an organization's Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.An assessment of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the development of a product and a process identified shortcomings, which presented opportunities for improvements.The assessment criteria were found to be suitable for manufactured products, with minor improvements.This paper provides concrete criteria for the assessment of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, which is lacking in the literature.The criteria identified provide organizations with an opportunity to assess and improve their Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61552/jibi.2026.02.003
Primary Topic
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FMEAS

Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
article

CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FMEAS

article en

Abstract

Quality failures can be costly to an organization.To avoid failures, organizations perform a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for both the design of a product, and the manufacturing and assembly processes that create the product.However, there is a lack of assessment criteria for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.The approach used is design methods, which consist of exploration of a problem, solution creation, solution evaluation, and communication of the solution.Literature was explored to understand what is required for performing a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and assessment criteria were developed.The assessment criteria were then evaluated using a case study consisting of applying the criteria to an organization's Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.An assessment of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the development of a product and a process identified shortcomings, which presented opportunities for improvements.The assessment criteria were found to be suitable for manufactured products, with minor improvements.This paper provides concrete criteria for the assessment of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, which is lacking in the literature.The criteria identified provide organizations with an opportunity to assess and improve their Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

Journal of Innovations in Business and IndustryVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.