Electrocatalytic water oxidation with bioinspired cubane-type Co <sup>II</sup> complexes
Synthesis, characterization, and electrocatalytic water oxidation studies of the cubane-type complexes [(μ<sup>3</sup>-<b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup><b>O</b>)CoCl(MeOH)]<sub>4</sub> (1) and [(μ<sup>3</sup>-<b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup><b>O</b>)CoCl(MeOH)]<sub>4</sub> (2) are herein reported. Cubanes 1 and 2 were obtained in high yields under mild conditions by self-assembly of the ligands <b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup><b>OH</b> = 1-<i>H</i>-2-benzimidazolylmethanol and <b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup><b>OH</b> = 1-methyl-2-benzimidazolylmethanol with CoCl<sub>2</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O in basic methanolic solution. Both compounds feature a cubane-type structure in which the central {Co<sub>4</sub>O<sub>4</sub>} units are built by four Co<sup>II</sup> centers coordinated by alkoxide-bridged oxygen and nitrogen atoms from the deprotonated <b>L</b><sup><b><i>n</i></b></sup><b>OH</b> ligands and stabilized by MeOH molecules and chloride ions. Magnetic studies allowed the determination of <i>g</i> = 2.42 and <i>g</i> = 2.57 values for 1 and 2, respectively. At low temperatures, 1 shows antiferromagnetic behavior, while 2 shows ferromagnetic coupling. DFT analyses support the antiferromagnetic behavior of 1. Unfortunately, the same method was not effective at explaining the ferromagnetic character of 2. Such inconsistency was explained through an exhaustive ac-susceptibility study by considering the single molecular magnet (SMM) behavior of 2. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 and 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4) displayed catalytic currents at 1.65 and 1.68 V <i>vs.</i> Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE), corresponding to water oxidation, with TOF values of 1.04 and 1.99 s<sup>-1</sup>, overpotentials of 710 and 680 mV, faradaic efficiencies of 88% and 90%, and TON values of 2.8 and 3.5 for 1 and 2, respectively. Electrochemical Quartz Microbalance (EQCM) analysis showed the robustness of 1 and 2 since only around 0.05% of their mass was deposited on the electrode surface. Subsequent SEM-EDX microanalysis demonstrated that although 1 converts to CoO<sub><i>x</i></sub> during electrolysis, it also changes into an undetermined form of the original catalyst, containing C, O, and Co. In the case of 2, analysis of the electrode after WOC did not allow the detection of Co, C, or O, establishing 2 as a more stable catalyst than 1.
Authors
- Marcos Flores-Ãlamo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2996-7616)
- Stefani Gamboa-Ramírez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-509X)
- Maylis Orio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-8005)
- Ana Cristina García-Álvarez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-2445)
- Iván Castillo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4876-4339)
- Eduardo Sánchez‐Lara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-0103)
- Roberto Favela-Mendoza
- Sylvain Bertaina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-8830)
- Isabel Guerra-Tschuschke
- Elizabeth Rul-Ramírez
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Toulon (FR)
- Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX)
- Universidad de Granada (ES)
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Institut des Matériaux, de Microélectronique et des Nanosciences de Provence (FR)
- Centrale Méditerranée (FR)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dalton Transactions
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1039/d5dt01000d
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.03
Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México