Repercussions of a U.S. withdrawal from WHO will severely impact future global goals and performance

Abstract The US withdrawal from the World Health Organization involves the country ceasing its membership and financial contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision has several implications: The U.S. would save the funds it contributes to the global health body, which could be redirected to domestic health initiatives. It could also have more control over its health policies and responses without needing to align with the WHO guidelines. Nevertheless, the action may weaken the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises. The US would lose its leadership role in global health, potentially diminishing its influence in international health policy. U.S. researchers and institutions might face reduced opportunities for international collaboration on health research and data sharing. Finally, Without WHO coordination, the U.S. might be less prepared for global health threats, potentially making Americans less safe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05657-3
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repercussions of a U.S. withdrawal from WHO will severely impact future global goals and performance

Frederick M. Burkle, Krzysztof Goniewicz, Amir Khorram‐Manesh
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Repercussions of a U.S. withdrawal from WHO will severely impact future global goals and performance

Frederick M. Burkle, Krzysztof Goniewicz, Amir Khorram‐Manesh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The US withdrawal from the World Health Organization involves the country ceasing its membership and financial contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision has several implications: The U.S. would save the funds it contributes to the global health body, which could be redirected to domestic health initiatives. It could also have more control over its health policies and responses without needing to align with the WHO guidelines. Nevertheless, the action may weaken the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises. The US would lose its leadership role in global health, potentially diminishing its influence in international health policy. U.S. researchers and institutions might face reduced opportunities for international collaboration on health research and data sharing. Finally, Without WHO coordination, the U.S. might be less prepared for global health threats, potentially making Americans less safe.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (US), Polish Air Force Academy (PL), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Göteborgs Universitet
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.