Carbon Footprint of Crop Rotation Systems and Mitigation Options for Net Zeroing Greenhouse Gas Balance in Farms of Central Brazil

Different crop production scenarios and crop rotation systems should be investigated with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity levels, with it being possible to reach net-zero GHG emissions from grain production farms. This study was divided into three stages—the development of spreadsheets for data acquisition for each crop rotation, calculations of GHG emissions based on IPCC methodologies and specific regional emission factors, and an analysis of the main emissions and sinks sources we evaluated, including the potential for soil and biomass carbon (C) sequestration to offset agricultural emissions. The system C footprints were 2413, 2209, and 2096 kg CO2eq ha−1 for farms K, M, and G, respectively, demanding estimated C sequestration (soil or biomass) rates of 657, 602, and 571 kg C ha−1 year−1 to offset all emissions of agricultural phases. Mitigating practices can reduce GHG emissions, but compensation via sequestration (soil or biomass C) shall be required to achieve zero GHG emissions. Reserving approximately 10–15% of the farm’s total agricultural production area to plant native trees or eucalyptus in marginal areas or even introducing crop–livestock–forest integration or crop–forest integration systems can offset the GHG emissions of the entire agricultural production phase, considering the potential for soil and biomass C sequestration, showing that it is a feasible option for producing C credit from the agricultural sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7080258
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Footprint of Crop Rotation Systems and Mitigation Options for Net Zeroing Greenhouse Gas Balance in Farms of Central Brazil

Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo
AgriEngineering
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Carbon Footprint of Crop Rotation Systems and Mitigation Options for Net Zeroing Greenhouse Gas Balance in Farms of Central Brazil

Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo
article en

Abstract

Different crop production scenarios and crop rotation systems should be investigated with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity levels, with it being possible to reach net-zero GHG emissions from grain production farms. This study was divided into three stages—the development of spreadsheets for data acquisition for each crop rotation, calculations of GHG emissions based on IPCC methodologies and specific regional emission factors, and an analysis of the main emissions and sinks sources we evaluated, including the potential for soil and biomass carbon (C) sequestration to offset agricultural emissions. The system C footprints were 2413, 2209, and 2096 kg CO2eq ha−1 for farms K, M, and G, respectively, demanding estimated C sequestration (soil or biomass) rates of 657, 602, and 571 kg C ha−1 year−1 to offset all emissions of agricultural phases. Mitigating practices can reduce GHG emissions, but compensation via sequestration (soil or biomass C) shall be required to achieve zero GHG emissions. Reserving approximately 10–15% of the farm’s total agricultural production area to plant native trees or eucalyptus in marginal areas or even introducing crop–livestock–forest integration or crop–forest integration systems can offset the GHG emissions of the entire agricultural production phase, considering the potential for soil and biomass C sequestration, showing that it is a feasible option for producing C credit from the agricultural sector.

AgriEngineeringVol. 7(8)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.