The Problem of the Formation of Russian Statehood in its Civilizational and Political Dimension

The scientific aim of this article is to demonstrate, through an interdisciplinary methodology that harmoniously combines historical and political science approaches, to demonstrate the contradictory points of view of supporters of both liberal and Eurasian concepts.. Their representatives argue that the statehood of Rus’ emerged solely due to Eastern influence, specifically from Turkic hordes. These hordes, they claim, began closely interacting with the Slavic tribes settled along the middle Dnieper and adjacent territories as early as the dawn of the medieval era. Particular emphasis is placed on the Mongol influence, which, for nearly two hundred and fifty years, bound Ancient Rus’ to the Ulus of Jochi, otherwise known as the Golden Horde. According to liberal analysts, practicallythe entire history of Russian statehood for many centuries bore a “wild,” Eastern character, as it was not Rus’ itself but the great khans of the Golden Horde who dictated their unwavering will and imposed their system of values, thereby diverting Russia from the main path of true European progress. Eurasianists, by contrast, assign this period a significant progressive role, viewing it as having contributed to the formation of Great Russia and having laid the foundations of its unique civilizational identity — an identity to which, they argue, Russia is now beginning to return. In order to assess the validity or fallacy of these conclusions, one must begin with the principle of the interconnection between the state and statehood. Since statehood serves as an attribute of the state as a political institution, the author has chosen to build the evidentiary framework of this study by analyzing the early stages of Russian statehood in its civilizational and political dimensions, focusing on the events of the second half of the ninth and tenth centuries. This leads to the conclusion that the foundations of a distinctive national state and statehood were laid during this period, entirely independent of Turkic-Mongol ethnic influences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-3-130-138
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of the Formation of Russian Statehood in its Civilizational and Political Dimension

Николай Васильевич Асонов
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

The Problem of the Formation of Russian Statehood in its Civilizational and Political Dimension

Николай Васильевич Асонов
article en

Abstract

The scientific aim of this article is to demonstrate, through an interdisciplinary methodology that harmoniously combines historical and political science approaches, to demonstrate the contradictory points of view of supporters of both liberal and Eurasian concepts.. Their representatives argue that the statehood of Rus’ emerged solely due to Eastern influence, specifically from Turkic hordes. These hordes, they claim, began closely interacting with the Slavic tribes settled along the middle Dnieper and adjacent territories as early as the dawn of the medieval era. Particular emphasis is placed on the Mongol influence, which, for nearly two hundred and fifty years, bound Ancient Rus’ to the Ulus of Jochi, otherwise known as the Golden Horde. According to liberal analysts, practicallythe entire history of Russian statehood for many centuries bore a “wild,” Eastern character, as it was not Rus’ itself but the great khans of the Golden Horde who dictated their unwavering will and imposed their system of values, thereby diverting Russia from the main path of true European progress. Eurasianists, by contrast, assign this period a significant progressive role, viewing it as having contributed to the formation of Great Russia and having laid the foundations of its unique civilizational identity — an identity to which, they argue, Russia is now beginning to return. In order to assess the validity or fallacy of these conclusions, one must begin with the principle of the interconnection between the state and statehood. Since statehood serves as an attribute of the state as a political institution, the author has chosen to build the evidentiary framework of this study by analyzing the early stages of Russian statehood in its civilizational and political dimensions, focusing on the events of the second half of the ninth and tenth centuries. This leads to the conclusion that the foundations of a distinctive national state and statehood were laid during this period, entirely independent of Turkic-Mongol ethnic influences.

Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial UniversityVol. 15(3)
Moscow State Pedagogical University (RU), Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.