Challenges in Determining Whether ENSO Is a Damped or a Self‐Sustained Oscillation

Abstract The recharge oscillator (RO) model has been successfully used to understand different aspects of the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Fitting the RO to observations and climate model simulations consistently suggests that ENSO is a damped oscillator whose variability is sustained and made irregular by external weather noise. We investigate the methods that have been used to estimate the growth rate of ENSO by applying them to simulations of both damped and self‐sustained RO regimes. We find that fitting a linear RO leads to parameters that imply a damped oscillator even when the fitted data were produced by a model that is self‐sustained. Fitting a nonlinear RO also leads to a significant bias toward the damped regime. As such, it seems challenging to decide whether ENSO is a damped or a self‐sustained oscillation by fitting such models to observations, and the possibility that ENSO is self‐sustained cannot be ruled out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl116328
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in Determining Whether ENSO Is a Damped or a Self‐Sustained Oscillation

Eli Tziperman, E. Weeks
1 links
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

Challenges in Determining Whether ENSO Is a Damped or a Self‐Sustained Oscillation

Eli Tziperman, E. Weeks
article en

Abstract

Abstract The recharge oscillator (RO) model has been successfully used to understand different aspects of the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Fitting the RO to observations and climate model simulations consistently suggests that ENSO is a damped oscillator whose variability is sustained and made irregular by external weather noise. We investigate the methods that have been used to estimate the growth rate of ENSO by applying them to simulations of both damped and self‐sustained RO regimes. We find that fitting a linear RO leads to parameters that imply a damped oscillator even when the fitted data were produced by a model that is self‐sustained. Fitting a nonlinear RO also leads to a significant bias toward the damped regime. As such, it seems challenging to decide whether ENSO is a damped or a self‐sustained oscillation by fitting such models to observations, and the possibility that ENSO is self‐sustained cannot be ruled out.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(15)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Harvard University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Weizmann Institute of Science, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges in Determining Whether ENSO Is a Damped or a Self‐Sustained Oscillation — Eli Tziperman, E. Weeks · Geophysical Research Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS