Methodologies for analyzing Corporate Sustainability and their impact on the social dimension

Abstract This study investigates and compares corporate sustainability methodologies and initiatives with respect to their social dimension, examining their connection to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices while using the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE B3) of the Brazilian stock exchange (B3) as a benchmark. A systematic content analysis approach was employed, guided by three practical stages: (1) rigorous selection of materials for study, (2) coding and categorization of these materials, and (3) interpretation of the results. The analysis revealed that while some methodologies—such as the FTSE4Good, Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), and MSCI ESG Ratings—address social aspects similar to the ISE B3, none match the comprehensiveness of social criteria covered by the reference index. However, certain themes identified in other methodologies could be incorporated to enhance the scope of social issues assessed, thereby improving their utility as parameters for selecting socially responsible companies. This work contributes to the study of sustainability methodologies with a focus on social aspects and advances discussions on the social pillar of ESG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gestão & Produção
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2025v32e2725
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodologies for analyzing Corporate Sustainability and their impact on the social dimension

Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, Ícaro Guilherme Félix da Cunha, Maria Júlia Estevão de Melo Oliveira
Gestão & Produção
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Methodologies for analyzing Corporate Sustainability and their impact on the social dimension

Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, Ícaro Guilherme Félix da Cunha, Maria Júlia Estevão de Melo Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates and compares corporate sustainability methodologies and initiatives with respect to their social dimension, examining their connection to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices while using the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE B3) of the Brazilian stock exchange (B3) as a benchmark. A systematic content analysis approach was employed, guided by three practical stages: (1) rigorous selection of materials for study, (2) coding and categorization of these materials, and (3) interpretation of the results. The analysis revealed that while some methodologies—such as the FTSE4Good, Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), and MSCI ESG Ratings—address social aspects similar to the ISE B3, none match the comprehensiveness of social criteria covered by the reference index. However, certain themes identified in other methodologies could be incorporated to enhance the scope of social issues assessed, thereby improving their utility as parameters for selecting socially responsible companies. This work contributes to the study of sustainability methodologies with a focus on social aspects and advances discussions on the social pillar of ESG.

Gestão & ProduçãoVol. 32
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.