Mixed-Type Query Selection for Robotic Scientific Data Collection

We propose combining preference and rating query types into a mixed-type query selection to learn reward functions for robotic decision making to improve scientific data collection. Mixed-type query selection allows the scientist operating a robot to specify the robot's tradeoffs and goals in terms of both rating, giving a score to one robot plan, and preferences, selecting a preferred plan to another plan. While previous methods have used active learning to allow the user to specify tradeoffs between objectives using rating and preferences individually, our proposed method considers using multiple query types. We assume a user responds to these queries with some noise on their true preferences. Online estimation of error model parameters is difficult; therefore, we show results with both a tuned known error model and a heuristic mixed-type query selection method. When the error model is known, we show performance increases using our mixed-type query selection versus using only ratings or only preferences. In the more realistic case with an unknown error model, we show our heuristic performs better than the worst case single query type in all cases we tested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2025.3597488
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-Type Query Selection for Robotic Scientific Data Collection

A. M. Eng, Thane Somers, Geoffrey A. Hollinger, Ian C. Rankin
1 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Data Management and Algorithms
1.49
article

Mixed-Type Query Selection for Robotic Scientific Data Collection

A. M. Eng, Thane Somers, Geoffrey A. Hollinger, Ian C. Rankin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We propose combining preference and rating query types into a mixed-type query selection to learn reward functions for robotic decision making to improve scientific data collection. Mixed-type query selection allows the scientist operating a robot to specify the robot's tradeoffs and goals in terms of both rating, giving a score to one robot plan, and preferences, selecting a preferred plan to another plan. While previous methods have used active learning to allow the user to specify tradeoffs between objectives using rating and preferences individually, our proposed method considers using multiple query types. We assume a user responds to these queries with some noise on their true preferences. Online estimation of error model parameters is difficult; therefore, we show results with both a tuned known error model and a heuristic mixed-type query selection method. When the error model is known, we show performance increases using our mixed-type query selection versus using only ratings or only preferences. In the more realistic case with an unknown error model, we show our heuristic performs better than the worst case single query type in all cases we tested.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 10(10)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Oregon State University (US), Transnet (South Africa) (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Data Management and Algorithms
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.