Waveform Effects on Shear Wave Splitting Near Fault Zones

Abstract Shear wave splitting of teleseismic core phases such as SKS is commonly used to constrain mantle seismic anisotropy, a proxy for convective deformation. In plate boundaries, sharp lateral variations of splitting measurements near transform faults are often linked to deformation within a lithospheric shear zone below, but potential seismic waveform effects from heterogeneous structure on small scales may influence the interpretation. Here, we explore possible finite frequency effects on shear wave splitting near fault zones in a fully three‐dimensional anisotropic setting. We find that shear zones wider than 80 km, a scale set by the Fresnel zone, can be clearly detected, but narrower zones are less distinguishable. Near the edge of the shear zone, the combined effect of anisotropy and scattering generates false splitting measurements with large delay times and fast axis orientation approaching the back‐azimuth, a bias which can only be identified when records from different back‐azimuths are analyzed together. This substantiates that back‐azimuthal variations of splitting can arise not just from vertical layering but also lateral changes of anisotropic media. We also test the effects of shear zone edge geometry, epicentral distance, filtering frequency, crustal thickness, and sediment cover. Our study delineates the ability of shear wave splitting to resolve and investigate fault zones, and emphasizes the importance of good azimuthal coverage to correctly interpret observed anisotropy. Based on revisiting previous shear wave splitting and lithospheric deformation studies, we infer that many crustal fault zones are underlain by lithospheric shear zones at least 20 km wide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb031656
Citations
1
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waveform Effects on Shear Wave Splitting Near Fault Zones

T. W. Becker, Bin He, Junlin Hua, Hai Zhu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
High-pressure geophysics and materials
1.87
article

Waveform Effects on Shear Wave Splitting Near Fault Zones

T. W. Becker, Bin He, Junlin Hua, Hai Zhu, V. Schulte‐Pelkum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Shear wave splitting of teleseismic core phases such as SKS is commonly used to constrain mantle seismic anisotropy, a proxy for convective deformation. In plate boundaries, sharp lateral variations of splitting measurements near transform faults are often linked to deformation within a lithospheric shear zone below, but potential seismic waveform effects from heterogeneous structure on small scales may influence the interpretation. Here, we explore possible finite frequency effects on shear wave splitting near fault zones in a fully three‐dimensional anisotropic setting. We find that shear zones wider than 80 km, a scale set by the Fresnel zone, can be clearly detected, but narrower zones are less distinguishable. Near the edge of the shear zone, the combined effect of anisotropy and scattering generates false splitting measurements with large delay times and fast axis orientation approaching the back‐azimuth, a bias which can only be identified when records from different back‐azimuths are analyzed together. This substantiates that back‐azimuthal variations of splitting can arise not just from vertical layering but also lateral changes of anisotropic media. We also test the effects of shear zone edge geometry, epicentral distance, filtering frequency, crustal thickness, and sediment cover. Our study delineates the ability of shear wave splitting to resolve and investigate fault zones, and emphasizes the importance of good azimuthal coverage to correctly interpret observed anisotropy. Based on revisiting previous shear wave splitting and lithospheric deformation studies, we infer that many crustal fault zones are underlain by lithospheric shear zones at least 20 km wide.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(8)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.