Aromaticity and antiaromaticity in the cyclic 6π and 4π molecules of carbon and silicon E <sub>6</sub> H <sub>6</sub> and E <sub>4</sub> H <sub>4</sub> (E = C, Si)

Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory at the BP86/def2-TZVPP level are reported for the structures and aromaticities of the monocyclic molecules E<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and E<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (E = C, Si). The results reveal drastic differences between the carbon and silicon homologues. Benzene (1b) is the global energy minimum on the C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> PES whereas planar <i>D</i><sub>6h</sub> Si<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> (2d) is not an energy minimum and the <i>D</i><sub>3d</sub> form 2c is higher in energy than the prismane isomer 2a. There is an ubiquitous number of stable phenyl compounds but the only experimentally known Si<sub>6</sub>R<sub>6</sub> compound has the structure of the tricyclic species 2b, which is lower in energy than 2c. In sharp contrast, the homologous carbon isomer 1c is more than 120 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> higher in energy than 1b. The carbon compounds C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub> show a characteristic preference for substitution reaction of benzene 1b and for addition reaction of cyclobutadiene 3a. The Si<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> silicon homologue 2c has a weaker preference for substitution reaction than benzene, but also tetrasilacyclobutadiene 4a prefers substitution over the addition reaction. The comparison of the calculated (pseudo) π conjugation of the cyclic compounds and acyclic reference systems suggests aromatic stabilization/destabilization for the carbon systems. The values for the silicon compounds are inconclusive and the separation of σ and π interactions is difficult due to the strong deviation of some silicon systems from planarity. The NICS values are not a reliable indicator for aromatic stabilization due to π conjugation. Chemical bonding models that have been developed and derived for compounds in the first octal series of the periodic table are only suitable to a limited extent for molecules with heavier main group atoms. This comes from the radii of the s/p valence orbitals of the atoms, which are very similar for the first octal row atoms leading to effective sp hybridization. The chemical bonds of the heavier atoms have a much higher p character because the radius is bigger than the valence s orbitals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cp02697k
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aromaticity and antiaromaticity in the cyclic 6π and 4π molecules of carbon and silicon E 6 H 6 and E 4 H 4 (E = C, Si)

Lili Zhao, Ma Qin
3 citations
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
2.81
article

Aromaticity and antiaromaticity in the cyclic 6π and 4π molecules of carbon and silicon E 6 H 6 and E 4 H 4 (E = C, Si)

Lili Zhao, Ma Qin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory at the BP86/def2-TZVPP level are reported for the structures and aromaticities of the monocyclic molecules E<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and E<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (E = C, Si). The results reveal drastic differences between the carbon and silicon homologues. Benzene (1b) is the global energy minimum on the C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> PES whereas planar <i>D</i><sub>6h</sub> Si<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> (2d) is not an energy minimum and the <i>D</i><sub>3d</sub> form 2c is higher in energy than the prismane isomer 2a. There is an ubiquitous number of stable phenyl compounds but the only experimentally known Si<sub>6</sub>R<sub>6</sub> compound has the structure of the tricyclic species 2b, which is lower in energy than 2c. In sharp contrast, the homologous carbon isomer 1c is more than 120 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> higher in energy than 1b. The carbon compounds C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub> show a characteristic preference for substitution reaction of benzene 1b and for addition reaction of cyclobutadiene 3a. The Si<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> silicon homologue 2c has a weaker preference for substitution reaction than benzene, but also tetrasilacyclobutadiene 4a prefers substitution over the addition reaction. The comparison of the calculated (pseudo) π conjugation of the cyclic compounds and acyclic reference systems suggests aromatic stabilization/destabilization for the carbon systems. The values for the silicon compounds are inconclusive and the separation of σ and π interactions is difficult due to the strong deviation of some silicon systems from planarity. The NICS values are not a reliable indicator for aromatic stabilization due to π conjugation. Chemical bonding models that have been developed and derived for compounds in the first octal series of the periodic table are only suitable to a limited extent for molecules with heavier main group atoms. This comes from the radii of the s/p valence orbitals of the atoms, which are very similar for the first octal row atoms leading to effective sp hybridization. The chemical bonds of the heavier atoms have a much higher p character because the radius is bigger than the valence s orbitals.

Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsVol. 27(35)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Nanjing Tech University (CN), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Donostia International Physics Center (ES)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanjing Tech University, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
2.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.