Crisis Response and Institutional Learning in the Israeli Military: Negotiating Transparency and Security in the Aftermath of the Tze’elim Training Accidents

This study analyzes how military organizations navigate tensions between public accountability and internal learning processes through a detailed examination of two training accidents at the IDF. Using a mixed-methods analysis of media coverage spanning two decades, this research explores how organizational learning processes, transparency, and public trust interact during crises. The findings reveal inherent tensions between transparency and information security requirements, demonstrating how over-reliance on security arguments can backfire, leading to the loss of information control and erosion of public trust. The findings show that media discourse focusing on systemic failures rather than individual accountability leads to more significant organizational changes. The study introduces the concept of “second-order reliability”–the need for organizations not only to be reliable but also to be perceived as such by stakeholders. These findings offer guidance for organizations managing learning processes during crises, with implications for understanding contemporary challenges in military crisis management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Armed Forces & Society
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x251358661
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis Response and Institutional Learning in the Israeli Military: Negotiating Transparency and Security in the Aftermath of the Tze’elim Training Accidents

Oshri Bar-Gil
Armed Forces & Society
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Crisis Response and Institutional Learning in the Israeli Military: Negotiating Transparency and Security in the Aftermath of the Tze’elim Training Accidents

Oshri Bar-Gil
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how military organizations navigate tensions between public accountability and internal learning processes through a detailed examination of two training accidents at the IDF. Using a mixed-methods analysis of media coverage spanning two decades, this research explores how organizational learning processes, transparency, and public trust interact during crises. The findings reveal inherent tensions between transparency and information security requirements, demonstrating how over-reliance on security arguments can backfire, leading to the loss of information control and erosion of public trust. The findings show that media discourse focusing on systemic failures rather than individual accountability leads to more significant organizational changes. The study introduces the concept of “second-order reliability”–the need for organizations not only to be reliable but also to be perceived as such by stakeholders. These findings offer guidance for organizations managing learning processes during crises, with implications for understanding contemporary challenges in military crisis management.

Armed Forces & Society
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crisis Response and Institutional Learning in the Israeli Military: Negotiating Transparency and Security in the Aftermath of the Tze’elim Training Accidents — Oshri Bar-Gil · Armed Forces & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS