Enhancing Contractor Evaluation Using Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System

Contractor evaluation remains a major challenge in safety-critical industries such as oil and gas, where the need to comply with stringent Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) standards demands a robust and objective assessment mechanism. The existing manual evaluation methods are plagued by subjectivity, inconsistent data handling, and inability to resolve performance ties, leading to unreliable contractor differentiation. To address this problem, this study investigates how can a computational decision support framework minimize subjectivity and enhance ranking precision in contractor evaluations. It proposes a Decision Support System (DSS) based on the Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) to improve the accuracy, transparency, and efficiency of evaluations within the Contractor Safety Management System (CSMS). The DSS integrates qualitative and quantitative criteria using fuzzy logic and expert-assigned linguistic weights. Developed following the Waterfall software development lifecycle, the system was validated using black box testing and applied to realistic simulated data from ten contractors evaluated across multiple criteria and subcriteria. Results demonstrate that the DSS effectively resolves score ties present in manual evaluations, enabling finer distinctions among contractors, with the highest closeness coefficient of 0.479 achieved by the top-ranked contractor. This value reflects a 47.9% closeness to the ideal performance profile, marking a significant improvement over binary or aggregate-based evaluation methods..User feedback confirmed high satisfaction with system usability and performance. The proposed DSS offers a robust and adaptable framework for contractor evaluation, enhancing decision-making accuracy and operational transparency in high-risk environments. Its novelty lies in the integration of fuzzy linguistic modeling within a CSMS context to operationalize HSE performance evaluations. Future research should focus on incorporating advanced fuzzy logic methods and artificial intelligence to facilitate real-time, dynamic contractor evaluations under uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bit-Tech
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v8i1.2510
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Contractor Evaluation Using Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System

Faried Effendy, Barry Nuqoba, Taufik Taufik, Kartono Kartono et al.
bit-Tech
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Enhancing Contractor Evaluation Using Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System

Faried Effendy, Barry Nuqoba, Taufik Taufik, Kartono Kartono, Faiz Haidar Satriani Adli
article en

Abstract

Contractor evaluation remains a major challenge in safety-critical industries such as oil and gas, where the need to comply with stringent Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) standards demands a robust and objective assessment mechanism. The existing manual evaluation methods are plagued by subjectivity, inconsistent data handling, and inability to resolve performance ties, leading to unreliable contractor differentiation. To address this problem, this study investigates how can a computational decision support framework minimize subjectivity and enhance ranking precision in contractor evaluations. It proposes a Decision Support System (DSS) based on the Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) to improve the accuracy, transparency, and efficiency of evaluations within the Contractor Safety Management System (CSMS). The DSS integrates qualitative and quantitative criteria using fuzzy logic and expert-assigned linguistic weights. Developed following the Waterfall software development lifecycle, the system was validated using black box testing and applied to realistic simulated data from ten contractors evaluated across multiple criteria and subcriteria. Results demonstrate that the DSS effectively resolves score ties present in manual evaluations, enabling finer distinctions among contractors, with the highest closeness coefficient of 0.479 achieved by the top-ranked contractor. This value reflects a 47.9% closeness to the ideal performance profile, marking a significant improvement over binary or aggregate-based evaluation methods..User feedback confirmed high satisfaction with system usability and performance. The proposed DSS offers a robust and adaptable framework for contractor evaluation, enhancing decision-making accuracy and operational transparency in high-risk environments. Its novelty lies in the integration of fuzzy linguistic modeling within a CSMS context to operationalize HSE performance evaluations. Future research should focus on incorporating advanced fuzzy logic methods and artificial intelligence to facilitate real-time, dynamic contractor evaluations under uncertainty.

bit-TechVol. 8(1)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.