How could GenAI work on in-service teachers’ knowledge building process? An empirical study based on epistemic network analysis

Abstract In-service teacher professional development (TPD) is essential for improving teacher quality and student outcomes. Effective professional development equips teachers to actively engage in problem-solving and meaning construction. However, current online TPD often lacks tailored support, structured analysis, communication, and feedback, limiting teachers’ ability to engage in deep knowledge-building. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), exemplified by models like ChatGPT, has attracted significant attention for its potential in education, particularly in offering personalized feedback and fostering deep cognitive engagement. This study examines a large language model developed in China to investigate its impact on in-service teachers’ knowledge-building processes. Through analysis of frequency and epistemic network, this study demonstrates that GenAI significantly enhances in-service teachers’ information analysis and critical thinking. It also promotes greater attention to information processing, evaluation, and knowledge transfer during the knowledge-building process, although it performs less effectively in fostering social interaction and collaboration. The study further reveals that GenAI’s impact on knowledge building varies across learning tasks, with its support being particularly significant in higher-order, complex tasks. Building on these findings, the study offers recommendations for professional development for teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00544-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How could GenAI work on in-service teachers’ knowledge building process? An empirical study based on epistemic network analysis

Qi Wang, Hui Zhang
4 citations
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
article

How could GenAI work on in-service teachers’ knowledge building process? An empirical study based on epistemic network analysis

Qi Wang, Hui Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In-service teacher professional development (TPD) is essential for improving teacher quality and student outcomes. Effective professional development equips teachers to actively engage in problem-solving and meaning construction. However, current online TPD often lacks tailored support, structured analysis, communication, and feedback, limiting teachers’ ability to engage in deep knowledge-building. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), exemplified by models like ChatGPT, has attracted significant attention for its potential in education, particularly in offering personalized feedback and fostering deep cognitive engagement. This study examines a large language model developed in China to investigate its impact on in-service teachers’ knowledge-building processes. Through analysis of frequency and epistemic network, this study demonstrates that GenAI significantly enhances in-service teachers’ information analysis and critical thinking. It also promotes greater attention to information processing, evaluation, and knowledge transfer during the knowledge-building process, although it performs less effectively in fostering social interaction and collaboration. The study further reveals that GenAI’s impact on knowledge building varies across learning tasks, with its support being particularly significant in higher-order, complex tasks. Building on these findings, the study offers recommendations for professional development for teachers.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher EducationVol. 22(1)
Beijing Foreign Studies University (CN), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.