Feedstock and pyrolysis conditions of biochars: influence on soil phytotoxicity and water ecotoxicity

The use of biochar for soil restoration requires understanding ecological trade-offs, particularly how feedstock selection, dose, and production methods influence soil and aquatic ecotoxicity. The ecotoxicological effects of nine biochars derived from vineyard residues, Acacia wood, and olive pomace were evaluated after mixing them at rates of 1.5–5 % into two agricultural soils. Additionally, specific details of the biochar production method were assessed: blending ratios (vine pruning:stalks), pyrolysis temperature, (for Acacia wood) and hydrothermal activation method (for olive pomace). Physicochemical characterization — pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, carbon and nitrogen content, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), FTIR spectroscopy and inertinite content — was combined with ecotoxicological assessment ( Lactuca sativa L. phytotoxicity test and aquatic lethal and sub-lethal bioassays with Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus) . Vineyard pruning and shredded Acacia biochars, which had higher OM contents and lower EC and PAH concentrations, showed the lowest toxicity in soils and aqueous extracts. Soil mixed with biochar at 3–5 % blends optimally restored acidic soils through pH neutralization and moisture retention, which favoured seed growth. The aquatic assays showed stimulatory effects on D. magna feeding rates, increasing by 20–90 % at 5 % biochar concentration. Finally, production assessment revealed that both blending ratios and pyrolysis temperature caused minimal variability in organisms' responses. Hydrothermal activation reduced PAH content (<0.08 mg kg −1 ) but failed to reduce salinity-driven ecotoxicity. These results suggest that 3–5 % wood-derived biochars are suitable to restore soils without risk to aquatic ecosystems. Olive pomace and vine stalk alternatives need a pre-application screening to detect PAHs and salinity conditions, essential factors affecting physicochemical properties of agricultural soils and environmental safety. • Acacia, vine pruning, and olive pumace biochars enhance root growth. • Hydrothermal carbonization reduces PAHs without affecting toxicity. • 3–5 % biochar rates optimized root length in neutral and degraded soils, respectively. • Aqueous biochar extracts raise feeding rates of aquatic crustacean Daphnia magna. • Random reflectance and FTIR spectra effectively predict biochar toxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109935
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feedstock and pyrolysis conditions of biochars: influence on soil phytotoxicity and water ecotoxicity

Luísa Coelho, P.A.M. Mourão, María Custodio, Patrícia Palma et al.
3 citations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.02
article

Feedstock and pyrolysis conditions of biochars: influence on soil phytotoxicity and water ecotoxicity

Luísa Coelho, P.A.M. Mourão, María Custodio, Patrícia Palma, Sérgio Prats, Deolinda Flores, João Nuno Gomes Vicente Canedo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The use of biochar for soil restoration requires understanding ecological trade-offs, particularly how feedstock selection, dose, and production methods influence soil and aquatic ecotoxicity. The ecotoxicological effects of nine biochars derived from vineyard residues, Acacia wood, and olive pomace were evaluated after mixing them at rates of 1.5–5 % into two agricultural soils. Additionally, specific details of the biochar production method were assessed: blending ratios (vine pruning:stalks), pyrolysis temperature, (for Acacia wood) and hydrothermal activation method (for olive pomace). Physicochemical characterization — pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, carbon and nitrogen content, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), FTIR spectroscopy and inertinite content — was combined with ecotoxicological assessment ( Lactuca sativa L. phytotoxicity test and aquatic lethal and sub-lethal bioassays with Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus) . Vineyard pruning and shredded Acacia biochars, which had higher OM contents and lower EC and PAH concentrations, showed the lowest toxicity in soils and aqueous extracts. Soil mixed with biochar at 3–5 % blends optimally restored acidic soils through pH neutralization and moisture retention, which favoured seed growth. The aquatic assays showed stimulatory effects on D. magna feeding rates, increasing by 20–90 % at 5 % biochar concentration. Finally, production assessment revealed that both blending ratios and pyrolysis temperature caused minimal variability in organisms' responses. Hydrothermal activation reduced PAH content (<0.08 mg kg −1 ) but failed to reduce salinity-driven ecotoxicity. These results suggest that 3–5 % wood-derived biochars are suitable to restore soils without risk to aquatic ecosystems. Olive pomace and vine stalk alternatives need a pre-application screening to detect PAHs and salinity conditions, essential factors affecting physicochemical properties of agricultural soils and environmental safety. • Acacia, vine pruning, and olive pumace biochars enhance root growth. • Hydrothermal carbonization reduces PAHs without affecting toxicity. • 3–5 % biochar rates optimized root length in neutral and degraded soils, respectively. • Aqueous biochar extracts raise feeding rates of aquatic crustacean Daphnia magna. • Random reflectance and FTIR spectra effectively predict biochar toxicity.

Soil Biology and BiochemistryVol. 211
Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Évora (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Beja (PT), Department of Water (AU), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Misión Biológica de Galicia (ES), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.