Mechanism-Based Classification of Carbon–Oxygen Bond Functionalization by Transition Metal Catalysis

Abstract In this review, we categorize C–O bond functionalization reactions according to their underlying mechanisms, encompassing both C(sp²)–O and C(sp³)–O bond activations. While nickel-based catalysts have dominated the early and continuing developments in this area, recent efforts have expanded the scope to include a broader range of transition metals. Although molecular transformations catalyzed by these alternative metals are still in their infancy, they have yielded valuable mechanistic insights that are essential for future advancements. Moreover, it has become increasingly clear that traditional mechanistic frameworks are insufficient to fully explain the activation of inherently unreactive C–O bonds. This has led to a surge of interest in alternative activation paradigms, particularly dual activation strategies that exploit the synergistic roles of multiple catalytic components. By systematically summarizing current strategies for C–O bond activation, this review seeks to accelerate progress in the field and offer conceptual guidance for the broader activation of otherwise inert bonds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthesis
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2681-5792
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanism-Based Classification of Carbon–Oxygen Bond Functionalization by Transition Metal Catalysis

Yoshiaki Nakao, Rin Seki
Synthesis
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
article

Mechanism-Based Classification of Carbon–Oxygen Bond Functionalization by Transition Metal Catalysis

Yoshiaki Nakao, Rin Seki
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this review, we categorize C–O bond functionalization reactions according to their underlying mechanisms, encompassing both C(sp²)–O and C(sp³)–O bond activations. While nickel-based catalysts have dominated the early and continuing developments in this area, recent efforts have expanded the scope to include a broader range of transition metals. Although molecular transformations catalyzed by these alternative metals are still in their infancy, they have yielded valuable mechanistic insights that are essential for future advancements. Moreover, it has become increasingly clear that traditional mechanistic frameworks are insufficient to fully explain the activation of inherently unreactive C–O bonds. This has led to a surge of interest in alternative activation paradigms, particularly dual activation strategies that exploit the synergistic roles of multiple catalytic components. By systematically summarizing current strategies for C–O bond activation, this review seeks to accelerate progress in the field and offer conceptual guidance for the broader activation of otherwise inert bonds.

SynthesisVol. 57(24)
Kyoto University (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.