Evolutionary and Coevolutionary Multi-Agent Design Choices and Dynamics

We investigate two representation alternatives for the controllers of teams of cyber agents. We combine these controller representations with different evolutionary algorithms, one of which introduces a novel LLM-supported mutation operator. Using a cyber security scenario, we evaluate agent learning when one side is trained to compete against a side that does not evolve and when two sides coevolve with each other. This allows us to quantify the relative merits and tradeoffs of representation and algorithm combinations in terms of team performance. The scenario also allows us to compare the performance impact and dynamics of coevolution versus evolution under different combinations. Across the algorithms and representations, we observe that coevolution reduces the performance highs and lows of both sides while it induces fluctuations on both sides. In contrast, when only one-side is optimized, performance peaks are higher and is more sustained than when both sides are optimized with coevolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3712255.3726712
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolutionary and Coevolutionary Multi-Agent Design Choices and Dynamics

Una-May O’Reilly, Lucille Fuller, Erik Hemberg, Eric Yi Liu et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
0.89
article

Evolutionary and Coevolutionary Multi-Agent Design Choices and Dynamics

Una-May O’Reilly, Lucille Fuller, Erik Hemberg, Eric Yi Liu, Stephen Moskal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate two representation alternatives for the controllers of teams of cyber agents. We combine these controller representations with different evolutionary algorithms, one of which introduces a novel LLM-supported mutation operator. Using a cyber security scenario, we evaluate agent learning when one side is trained to compete against a side that does not evolve and when two sides coevolve with each other. This allows us to quantify the relative merits and tradeoffs of representation and algorithm combinations in terms of team performance. The scenario also allows us to compare the performance impact and dynamics of coevolution versus evolution under different combinations. Across the algorithms and representations, we observe that coevolution reduces the performance highs and lows of both sides while it induces fluctuations on both sides. In contrast, when only one-side is optimized, performance peaks are higher and is more sustained than when both sides are optimized with coevolution.

Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
IIT@MIT (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
0.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.