Heterogeneous household responses and indoor temperature inequality in the clean heating transition

The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous household responses and indoor temperature inequality in the clean heating transition

Xinzhu Zheng, Yuxin Bai, Ling Zhang, Yue Ren et al.
Engineering
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Heterogeneous household responses and indoor temperature inequality in the clean heating transition

Xinzhu Zheng, Yuxin Bai, Ling Zhang, Yue Ren, Junyuan Xu, Jianhui Cong, Jie Li, Can Wang, Tianyi Zhang, Yang Su
article en

Abstract

The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.

Engineering
Shanxi University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
China Association for Science and Technology, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Association for Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.