Preventing vicarious trauma through the research process as healing justice praxis

This article explores how our research team integrated abolition feminism (Davis et al, 2022), critical inquiry, embodiment and praxis-based knowledge into a four-year process investigating transformative justice (TJ) and restorative justice (RJ) remedies for gender-based violence. To generate insights, we used an iterative approach that involved reflective memo writing, team dialogue and engagement with relevant literature on gender-based violence and vicarious trauma. Drawing from healing justice and praxis (Freire, 1968; Pyles, 2020; Page and Woodland, 2023), we wove together reflection and action to foster belonging, meaningful productivity and collective growth. This process not only deepened our understanding of TJ and RJ, but also supported us in reducing vicarious trauma and mitigating its harms. We share these insights to aid other researchers in developing trauma-informed, justice-oriented approaches to address gender-based violence and its impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2025d000000102
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing vicarious trauma through the research process as healing justice praxis

Sheila M. McMahon, Jelena Todić, M. Candace Christensen
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Preventing vicarious trauma through the research process as healing justice praxis

Sheila M. McMahon, Jelena Todić, M. Candace Christensen
article en

Abstract

This article explores how our research team integrated abolition feminism (Davis et al, 2022), critical inquiry, embodiment and praxis-based knowledge into a four-year process investigating transformative justice (TJ) and restorative justice (RJ) remedies for gender-based violence. To generate insights, we used an iterative approach that involved reflective memo writing, team dialogue and engagement with relevant literature on gender-based violence and vicarious trauma. Drawing from healing justice and praxis (Freire, 1968; Pyles, 2020; Page and Woodland, 2023), we wove together reflection and action to foster belonging, meaningful productivity and collective growth. This process not only deepened our understanding of TJ and RJ, but also supported us in reducing vicarious trauma and mitigating its harms. We share these insights to aid other researchers in developing trauma-informed, justice-oriented approaches to address gender-based violence and its impacts.

Journal of Gender-Based Violence
University of San Diego (US), University of Michigan (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preventing vicarious trauma through the research process as healing justice praxis — Sheila M. McMahon, Jelena Todić, et al. · Journal of Gender-Based Violence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS