No-panic pragmatism

This chapter investigates the educational preparedness of Nordic academic journalism schools to teach artificial intelligence (AI) in 2024. More specifically, we examine journalism educators’ initial ideas on AI at a time when AI had gained prominence in public, following the release of the first user-friendly applications of generative and conversational AI. Based on the concept of pedagogical domestication of new technologies and journalism schools’ responsibility to critically adapt to industry development, we conducted a survey among journalism educators at major Nordic journalism education institutions (N=118, response rate 58%). We found that academic educators had mixed feelings about AI technologies. They expressed the need for AI to be incorporated primarily in the teaching of journalism ethics, as well as in fact-checking and information validation processes, but highlighted that the journalistic core values and understandings of the world needs to remain the same. With a mode of ‘no-panic pragmatism’, educators perceived AI as something that should be integrated into existing structures rather than anticipating a structural change in education. The study provides an initial documentation of the current state of journalism education and concludes with suggestions for further research and development of pedagogical practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v19i1.151947
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No-panic pragmatism

Jenny Wiik, Maarit Jaakkola
Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

No-panic pragmatism

Jenny Wiik, Maarit Jaakkola
article en

Abstract

This chapter investigates the educational preparedness of Nordic academic journalism schools to teach artificial intelligence (AI) in 2024. More specifically, we examine journalism educators’ initial ideas on AI at a time when AI had gained prominence in public, following the release of the first user-friendly applications of generative and conversational AI. Based on the concept of pedagogical domestication of new technologies and journalism schools’ responsibility to critically adapt to industry development, we conducted a survey among journalism educators at major Nordic journalism education institutions (N=118, response rate 58%). We found that academic educators had mixed feelings about AI technologies. They expressed the need for AI to be incorporated primarily in the teaching of journalism ethics, as well as in fact-checking and information validation processes, but highlighted that the journalistic core values and understandings of the world needs to remain the same. With a mode of ‘no-panic pragmatism’, educators perceived AI as something that should be integrated into existing structures rather than anticipating a structural change in education. The study provides an initial documentation of the current state of journalism education and concludes with suggestions for further research and development of pedagogical practices.

Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistikVol. 19(1)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.