Exploratory Assessment of Advocates & Allies Workshops at a Midwestern STEM-Focused Institution

Advocates and Allies (A&A) programs, designed to educate individuals from demographic majority groups to become more centrally involved in equality endeavors, have been introduced to more than twenty U.S higher education institutions with the support of NSF ADVANCE grant funding. Most evaluations of the impact of these programs have been through indirect measures, such as self-reports of satisfaction with the training. We analyzed data across five years and several iterations of A&A workshops at a research-active, public Midwestern, predominantly White, STEM-dominant university to determine changes in participants’ perceptions of equity at the institution. Results suggest that participants left the workshops with more perceptions of local inequity at the institution than they reported before the workshop. Effects were found for both perceptions of racial equity and perceptions of gender equity but were stronger and more consistent for the latter. The effects of the workshops varied across time. Implications of the results for scholarship and practice for the improvement of advocacy programs are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADVANCE Journal
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/advjrnl.6.1.7
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory Assessment of Advocates & Allies Workshops at a Midwestern STEM-Focused Institution

Karen Colbert, Adrienne Minerick, Betsy R. Lehman, Sonia M. Goltz
ADVANCE Journal
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

Exploratory Assessment of Advocates & Allies Workshops at a Midwestern STEM-Focused Institution

Karen Colbert, Adrienne Minerick, Betsy R. Lehman, Sonia M. Goltz
article en

Abstract

Advocates and Allies (A&A) programs, designed to educate individuals from demographic majority groups to become more centrally involved in equality endeavors, have been introduced to more than twenty U.S higher education institutions with the support of NSF ADVANCE grant funding. Most evaluations of the impact of these programs have been through indirect measures, such as self-reports of satisfaction with the training. We analyzed data across five years and several iterations of A&A workshops at a research-active, public Midwestern, predominantly White, STEM-dominant university to determine changes in participants’ perceptions of equity at the institution. Results suggest that participants left the workshops with more perceptions of local inequity at the institution than they reported before the workshop. Effects were found for both perceptions of racial equity and perceptions of gender equity but were stronger and more consistent for the latter. The effects of the workshops varied across time. Implications of the results for scholarship and practice for the improvement of advocacy programs are discussed.

ADVANCE JournalVol. 6(1)
Michigan Technological University (US)
North Dakota State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploratory Assessment of Advocates & Allies Workshops at a Midwestern STEM-Focused Institution — Karen Colbert, Adrienne Minerick, et al. · ADVANCE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS