Developing and Testing a Multi-Stage Faculty Mentoring Framework

Underrepresented minority (URM) faculty in higher education institutions often lack equal access to mentoring which contributes to high turnover rates. Even with equal access for all faculty, existing mentoring structures may not adequately address the unique needs of URM faculty across the career-span. We developed a Multi-Stage Mentoring Framework which utilizes a network of mentors to attend to the instrumental and psychosocial needs of faculty at every career stage. We evaluated how well existing mentoring programs at one university fit into the framework. Using both quantitative and qualitative responses, we determined that this constellation of institutional mentoring programs cumulatively provide opportunities for both instrumental and psychosocial formal mentoring support for faculty who span the early through late career stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADVANCE Journal
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/advjrnl.6.1.10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and Testing a Multi-Stage Faculty Mentoring Framework

Christine P. Li‐Grining, Walter Tangarife, Dana Garbarski, Bisma Ahad et al.
1 citations
ADVANCE Journal
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
article

Developing and Testing a Multi-Stage Faculty Mentoring Framework

Christine P. Li‐Grining, Walter Tangarife, Dana Garbarski, Bisma Ahad, Robyn K. Mallett, David C. Ensminger, Zahra Naqi-Hasnain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Underrepresented minority (URM) faculty in higher education institutions often lack equal access to mentoring which contributes to high turnover rates. Even with equal access for all faculty, existing mentoring structures may not adequately address the unique needs of URM faculty across the career-span. We developed a Multi-Stage Mentoring Framework which utilizes a network of mentors to attend to the instrumental and psychosocial needs of faculty at every career stage. We evaluated how well existing mentoring programs at one university fit into the framework. Using both quantitative and qualitative responses, we determined that this constellation of institutional mentoring programs cumulatively provide opportunities for both instrumental and psychosocial formal mentoring support for faculty who span the early through late career stages.

ADVANCE JournalVol. 6(1)
Emory University (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation, Emory University, Northwestern University, Loyola University Chicago
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing and Testing a Multi-Stage Faculty Mentoring Framework — Christine P. Li‐Grining, Walter Tangarife, et al. · ADVANCE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS