Air Force Combatives: An Examination of Self-Efficacy and Delivery of Women into Combat Roles

This study examines students’ development of self-efficacy in gender-integrated versus segregated combatives training at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research compares self-efficacy changes in cadets who participated in gender-segregated (2017) and gender-integrated (2018) combatives classes. Quantitative data, collected through pre- and post-test combat-specific self-efficacy scales, were analyzed to assess changes by training type and gender. Qualitative data, gathered from interviews and field notes, were thematically examined to understand cadet experiences in the integrated setting. Results indicate that combatives training improves participants’ combat self-efficacy, particularly when courses are gender integrated. Furthermore, the study identified three key themes—experiencing new emotions, developing interpersonal skills, and facing stress together—which likely contribute to both self-efficacy and the perceived legitimacy of the warrior role among male and female cadets. Findings support the efficacy of gender-integrated combatives training and offer insights for effectively preparing women for combat roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADVANCE Journal
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/advjrnl.6.1.5
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air Force Combatives: An Examination of Self-Efficacy and Delivery of Women into Combat Roles

Erika L. King, Jacquelyn Boone James, Elissa Hack, Amanda Metcalfe
ADVANCE Journal
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Air Force Combatives: An Examination of Self-Efficacy and Delivery of Women into Combat Roles

Erika L. King, Jacquelyn Boone James, Elissa Hack, Amanda Metcalfe
article en

Abstract

This study examines students’ development of self-efficacy in gender-integrated versus segregated combatives training at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research compares self-efficacy changes in cadets who participated in gender-segregated (2017) and gender-integrated (2018) combatives classes. Quantitative data, collected through pre- and post-test combat-specific self-efficacy scales, were analyzed to assess changes by training type and gender. Qualitative data, gathered from interviews and field notes, were thematically examined to understand cadet experiences in the integrated setting. Results indicate that combatives training improves participants’ combat self-efficacy, particularly when courses are gender integrated. Furthermore, the study identified three key themes—experiencing new emotions, developing interpersonal skills, and facing stress together—which likely contribute to both self-efficacy and the perceived legitimacy of the warrior role among male and female cadets. Findings support the efficacy of gender-integrated combatives training and offer insights for effectively preparing women for combat roles.

ADVANCE JournalVol. 6(1)
United States Air Force Academy (US), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force Academy
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Air Force Combatives: An Examination of Self-Efficacy and Delivery of Women into Combat Roles — Erika L. King, Jacquelyn Boone James, et al. · ADVANCE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS