Komparasi Efikasi Skrining Kanker Serviks Menggunakan HPV DNA Testing, Pap Smear, Dan Liquid Biopsy: Tinjauan Sistematis

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide, making early detection through effective screening crucial. This study aims to compare the efficacy of three cervical cancer screening methods: HPV DNA testing, pap smear, and liquid biopsy. The method used is a systematic review based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with literature searches conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from 2019 to 2025. Out of 657 articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed descriptively and comparatively. The results indicated that HPV DNA testing had the highest sensitivity (73–96%) and negative predictive value (90–99%), but its specificity varied (39–97%). Pap smear had lower sensitivity (30–64%) but good specificity and positive predictive value (65–92% and 63–89%). Liquid biopsy offered very high specificity and positive predictive value (89–100% and 70–100%), but its sensitivity was still limited (27–78%). A combination of the three methods is recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy and the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. HPV DNA testing excels in early detection, Pap smear is suitable for resource-limited areas, and liquid biopsy holds potential as a confirmation or monitoring method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Health Community
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31331/ijheco.v6i1.3893
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Komparasi Efikasi Skrining Kanker Serviks Menggunakan HPV DNA Testing, Pap Smear, Dan Liquid Biopsy: Tinjauan Sistematis

Septia Puji Mayasari
Indonesian Journal of Health Community
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Komparasi Efikasi Skrining Kanker Serviks Menggunakan HPV DNA Testing, Pap Smear, Dan Liquid Biopsy: Tinjauan Sistematis

Septia Puji Mayasari
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide, making early detection through effective screening crucial. This study aims to compare the efficacy of three cervical cancer screening methods: HPV DNA testing, pap smear, and liquid biopsy. The method used is a systematic review based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with literature searches conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from 2019 to 2025. Out of 657 articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed descriptively and comparatively. The results indicated that HPV DNA testing had the highest sensitivity (73–96%) and negative predictive value (90–99%), but its specificity varied (39–97%). Pap smear had lower sensitivity (30–64%) but good specificity and positive predictive value (65–92% and 63–89%). Liquid biopsy offered very high specificity and positive predictive value (89–100% and 70–100%), but its sensitivity was still limited (27–78%). A combination of the three methods is recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy and the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. HPV DNA testing excels in early detection, Pap smear is suitable for resource-limited areas, and liquid biopsy holds potential as a confirmation or monitoring method.

Indonesian Journal of Health CommunityVol. 6(1)
Universitas Jambi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Komparasi Efikasi Skrining Kanker Serviks Menggunakan HPV DNA Testing, Pap Smear, Dan Liquid Biopsy: Tinjauan Sistematis — Septia Puji Mayasari · Indonesian Journal of Health Community (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS