The Development and Piloting of a Quality of Life Assessment Tool for Dogs

Assessing dogs’ quality of life (QoL) pre- and post-adoption is crucial for shelters and rehoming organisations making decisions with far reaching and dire consequences for both dogs and humans. Making these assessments objectively and in a standardized way is important. As a first step to accomplish these two imperative goals, an assessment tool was developed based on the Framework of Dogs’ Needs, a robust model of needs at a species, breed/breed type, and individual levels based on scientific literature and expert opinion. It qualifies dogs’ QoL as a function of how well their needs are met. Because this tool will be used in real world situations, ensuring it is feasible and comprehensible by a non-scientific audience is key. Therefore, the three-step assessment tool was piloted with a dog owner sample (n = 14): a participant-completed questionnaire, an investigator given questionnaire with video chat observations (of the dog and their home environment), and participant recorded videos (of the dog displaying specific behaviours and scenarios). Participants then completed a feedback gathering survey on the entire process. Issues and aspects to change were also noted throughout by the principal investigator. Most issues pertained to the participant recorded videos, particularly regarding recording feasibility. Most participants said the collective time and effort involved in the assessment procedure would not discourage them from participating. Necessary changes were made to the tool based on all feedback and issues noted. It is now ready for usage in a larger project to assess dogs’ QoL throughout the sheltering and rehoming process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pets
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2030028
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development and Piloting of a Quality of Life Assessment Tool for Dogs

Karen E. Griffin, Claudia M. Vinke
Pets
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

The Development and Piloting of a Quality of Life Assessment Tool for Dogs

Karen E. Griffin, Claudia M. Vinke
article en

Abstract

Assessing dogs’ quality of life (QoL) pre- and post-adoption is crucial for shelters and rehoming organisations making decisions with far reaching and dire consequences for both dogs and humans. Making these assessments objectively and in a standardized way is important. As a first step to accomplish these two imperative goals, an assessment tool was developed based on the Framework of Dogs’ Needs, a robust model of needs at a species, breed/breed type, and individual levels based on scientific literature and expert opinion. It qualifies dogs’ QoL as a function of how well their needs are met. Because this tool will be used in real world situations, ensuring it is feasible and comprehensible by a non-scientific audience is key. Therefore, the three-step assessment tool was piloted with a dog owner sample (n = 14): a participant-completed questionnaire, an investigator given questionnaire with video chat observations (of the dog and their home environment), and participant recorded videos (of the dog displaying specific behaviours and scenarios). Participants then completed a feedback gathering survey on the entire process. Issues and aspects to change were also noted throughout by the principal investigator. Most issues pertained to the participant recorded videos, particularly regarding recording feasibility. Most participants said the collective time and effort involved in the assessment procedure would not discourage them from participating. Necessary changes were made to the tool based on all feedback and issues noted. It is now ready for usage in a larger project to assess dogs’ QoL throughout the sheltering and rehoming process.

PetsVol. 2(3)
Utrecht University (NL), Museum of the Earth (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.