Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significant reasoning capabilities and can act as agents interacting with the real world. However, they are often segmented and, unlike humans, lack integrated systems for validating their thoughts and actions. This limitation often leads LLMs to encounter “local optima” in task performance. To mitigate this problem, we propose a replanning mechanism for LLM-based agents that dynamically incorporates feedback from actions and exploits implicit information not initially available in the reasoning framework. This approach effectively bridges the gap between the cognitive and action phases of LLMs. Experimental results on real-world ticket booking platforms such as Ctrip.com and Booking.com show that our method exhibits greater robustness in following clear instructions, successfully completing more steps, and achieving a higher success rate in practical applications, especially in complex tasks requiring interactive reasoning and action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00054
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning

Lin Zhang, Yang Wang, Qing Li, Jingmei Zhao
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning

Lin Zhang, Yang Wang, Qing Li, Jingmei Zhao
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significant reasoning capabilities and can act as agents interacting with the real world. However, they are often segmented and, unlike humans, lack integrated systems for validating their thoughts and actions. This limitation often leads LLMs to encounter “local optima” in task performance. To mitigate this problem, we propose a replanning mechanism for LLM-based agents that dynamically incorporates feedback from actions and exploits implicit information not initially available in the reasoning framework. This approach effectively bridges the gap between the cognitive and action phases of LLMs. Experimental results on real-world ticket booking platforms such as Ctrip.com and Booking.com show that our method exhibits greater robustness in following clear instructions, successfully completing more steps, and achieving a higher success rate in practical applications, especially in complex tasks requiring interactive reasoning and action.

Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning — Lin Zhang, Yang Wang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS