Underwater Robotic Simulators Review for Autonomous System Development

The increasing complexity of underwater robotic systems has led to a surge in simulation platforms designed to support perception, planning, and control tasks in marine environments. However, selecting the most appropriate under-water robotic simulator (URS) remains a challenge due to wide variations in fidelity, extensibility, and task suitability. This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of five state-of-the-art, ROS-compatible, open-source URSs: Stonefish, DAVE, HoloOcean, MARUS, and UNav-Sim. Each simulator is evaluated across multiple criteria including sensor fidelity, environmental realism, sim-to-real capabilities, and research impact. We evaluate them across architectural design, sensor and physics modeling, task capabilities, and research impact. Additionally, we discuss ongoing challenges in sim-to-real transfer and highlight the need for standardization and benchmarking in the field. Our findings aim to guide practitioners in selecting effective simulation environments and inform future development of more robust and transferable URSs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/oceans58557.2025.11104581
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underwater Robotic Simulators Review for Autonomous System Development

Peng Wu, Dimitrios Kanoulas, Yuanchang Liu, Sara Aldhaheri et al.
5 citations
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
5.73
article

Underwater Robotic Simulators Review for Autonomous System Development

Peng Wu, Dimitrios Kanoulas, Yuanchang Liu, Sara Aldhaheri, Hu Yang, Yongchang Xie
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The increasing complexity of underwater robotic systems has led to a surge in simulation platforms designed to support perception, planning, and control tasks in marine environments. However, selecting the most appropriate under-water robotic simulator (URS) remains a challenge due to wide variations in fidelity, extensibility, and task suitability. This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of five state-of-the-art, ROS-compatible, open-source URSs: Stonefish, DAVE, HoloOcean, MARUS, and UNav-Sim. Each simulator is evaluated across multiple criteria including sensor fidelity, environmental realism, sim-to-real capabilities, and research impact. We evaluate them across architectural design, sensor and physics modeling, task capabilities, and research impact. Additionally, we discuss ongoing challenges in sim-to-real transfer and highlight the need for standardization and benchmarking in the field. Our findings aim to guide practitioners in selecting effective simulation environments and inform future development of more robust and transferable URSs.

University College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
5.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Underwater Robotic Simulators Review for Autonomous System Development — Peng Wu, Dimitrios Kanoulas, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS