Insights from Railway Professionals: Rethinking Railway Assumptions Regarding Safety and Autonomy

This study investigates how railway professionals perceive ‘safety’ as a concept within rail, with the intention to help inform future technological developments within the industry. Through a series of interviews with drivers, route planners, and administrative personnel, the research explores the current state of safety practices, the potential for automation and the understanding of the railway as a system of systems. Key findings highlight a cautious attitude towards automation, a preference for assistive technologies, and a complex understanding of safety that integrates human, systematic and technological factors. The study also addresses the limitations of transferring automotive automation technologies to railways and the need for a railway-specific causation model to better evaluate and enhance safety in an evolving technological landscape. This study aims to bridge the gap between contemporary research and practical applications, contributing to the development of more effective safety metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edcc66201.2025.00016
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights from Railway Professionals: Rethinking Railway Assumptions Regarding Safety and Autonomy

John McDermid, Simon Burton, Josh Hunter
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Insights from Railway Professionals: Rethinking Railway Assumptions Regarding Safety and Autonomy

John McDermid, Simon Burton, Josh Hunter
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how railway professionals perceive ‘safety’ as a concept within rail, with the intention to help inform future technological developments within the industry. Through a series of interviews with drivers, route planners, and administrative personnel, the research explores the current state of safety practices, the potential for automation and the understanding of the railway as a system of systems. Key findings highlight a cautious attitude towards automation, a preference for assistive technologies, and a complex understanding of safety that integrates human, systematic and technological factors. The study also addresses the limitations of transferring automotive automation technologies to railways and the need for a railway-specific causation model to better evaluate and enhance safety in an evolving technological landscape. This study aims to bridge the gap between contemporary research and practical applications, contributing to the development of more effective safety metrics.

University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Insights from Railway Professionals: Rethinking Railway Assumptions Regarding Safety and Autonomy — John McDermid, Simon Burton, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS