Stability Analysis of Acoustic Models in Undulating Terrain

In the sound propagation experiment conducted in the South China Sea, a comparison between measured and simulated data revealed differences in the sensitivity of various acoustic models to terrain characteristics under identical conditions. To systematically analyze this sensitivity, the models Bellhop, RAM, and KRAKEN were compared against the Couple model under different terrain conditions at receiving depths of 100m and 300m. The results showed that KRAKEN significantly reduces multiple reflections from the seabed and sea surface in sharply undulating terrain. Error analysis indicated that for errors in terrain location, height, and angle, the average errors of Bellhop and RAM at a receiving depth of 100m were 0.67dB, 1.5dB, and 1.33dB lower, respectively, than those at 300m. Furthermore, analysis within the frequency range of 0–500Hz demonstrated that RAM exhibits better stability than Bellhop at receiving depths of 0–200m. This study provides theoretical support for sound propagation simulation under complex terrain and model selection in realistic marine environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/oceans58557.2025.11104580
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability Analysis of Acoustic Models in Undulating Terrain

Hanyue Wang, Feng Xiao, Minghui Li, Cheng Chen et al.
Landslides and related hazards
article

Stability Analysis of Acoustic Models in Undulating Terrain

Hanyue Wang, Feng Xiao, Minghui Li, Cheng Chen, Changqing Wang
article en

Abstract

In the sound propagation experiment conducted in the South China Sea, a comparison between measured and simulated data revealed differences in the sensitivity of various acoustic models to terrain characteristics under identical conditions. To systematically analyze this sensitivity, the models Bellhop, RAM, and KRAKEN were compared against the Couple model under different terrain conditions at receiving depths of 100m and 300m. The results showed that KRAKEN significantly reduces multiple reflections from the seabed and sea surface in sharply undulating terrain. Error analysis indicated that for errors in terrain location, height, and angle, the average errors of Bellhop and RAM at a receiving depth of 100m were 0.67dB, 1.5dB, and 1.33dB lower, respectively, than those at 300m. Furthermore, analysis within the frequency range of 0–500Hz demonstrated that RAM exhibits better stability than Bellhop at receiving depths of 0–200m. This study provides theoretical support for sound propagation simulation under complex terrain and model selection in realistic marine environments.

Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.