Analysis of Multiplexer and Demultiplexer using Adiabatic Logic for low power VLSI application

With the growing demand for energy-efficient VLSI circuits, adiabatic logic has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional CMOS-based designs. This study examines the performance of multiplexer (MUX) and demultiplexer (DEMUX) circuits implemented using static CMOS, 2N2P, and 2N2N2P logic families. A comparative analysis is conducted based on power consumption, propagation delay, energy efficiency, and power-delay product (PDP). Cadence Virtuoso simulations has been used at 45nm technology. Simulation results reveal that while CMOS circuits demonstrate lower delay, they suffer from significant power dissipation, limiting their suitability for low-power applications. On the other hand, 2N2P and 2N2N2P logic-based designs effectively reduce power losses through charge recovery techniques, with 2N2P achieving superior energy efficiency. Although 2N2N2P offers a trade-off between power savings and performance, it introduces additional circuit complexity. It can be concluded that adiabatic logic provides a power-efficient alternative to traditional CMOS, making it highly suitable for low-power VLSI applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eaic66483.2025.11101444
Primary Topic
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Multiplexer and Demultiplexer using Adiabatic Logic for low power VLSI application

Ashwani K. Rana, Pankaj Sharma
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
article

Analysis of Multiplexer and Demultiplexer using Adiabatic Logic for low power VLSI application

Ashwani K. Rana, Pankaj Sharma
article en

Abstract

With the growing demand for energy-efficient VLSI circuits, adiabatic logic has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional CMOS-based designs. This study examines the performance of multiplexer (MUX) and demultiplexer (DEMUX) circuits implemented using static CMOS, 2N2P, and 2N2N2P logic families. A comparative analysis is conducted based on power consumption, propagation delay, energy efficiency, and power-delay product (PDP). Cadence Virtuoso simulations has been used at 45nm technology. Simulation results reveal that while CMOS circuits demonstrate lower delay, they suffer from significant power dissipation, limiting their suitability for low-power applications. On the other hand, 2N2P and 2N2N2P logic-based designs effectively reduce power losses through charge recovery techniques, with 2N2P achieving superior energy efficiency. Although 2N2N2P offers a trade-off between power savings and performance, it introduces additional circuit complexity. It can be concluded that adiabatic logic provides a power-efficient alternative to traditional CMOS, making it highly suitable for low-power VLSI applications.

National Institute of Technology Hamirpur (BD)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.