How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate the ecosystem services supply and demand mismatch in the Luo River Basin?

• A research framework of “supply / demand-flow-compensation” for ecosystem services was constructed. • Ecosystem service flow pathways are simulated using the breakpoint formula and field strength model. • Ecological compensation optimized using coefficients of natural , economy, society, and Gini. • Priority areas of ecological compensation were identified. The ecological compensation (EC) mechanism is crucial for balancing regional development, enhancing ecosystem services (ESs), and achieving sustainable development goals. However, how to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate the ecosystem service supply and demand mismatch remains unsolved. This study examines the Luo River Basin and applies theories of externalities and environmental justice. The InVEST and spatial analysis models are used to evaluate the supply and demand of four ESs—carbon sequestration (CS), food production (FP), soil retention (SR), and water yield (WY)—from 2000 to 2020. The ecological service flow (ESF) path in the Luo River basin is simulated using the breakpoint formula and field strength model, comprehensively considering terrain and land use resistance. Construct an EC model integrating comprehensive natural differentials, economic levels, and social development coefficients, and prioritize compensation. Employ the Gini coefficient to adjust for distributional equity. There is a mismatch between supply and demand for ESs in the Luo River Basin from 2000 to 2020, with supply services CS, SR, and WY trending downward and FP trending upward. Demand service CS is trending up and FP, SR and WY are trending down. ESF flows weakened with distance and flowed primarily from the southwest to the northeast of the Luo River Basin, with the highest number of service flows in WY. The total EC reaches 393.4 million yuan. Song County receives the highest EC (95.8 million yuan), while Luolong District has the highest compensation payment (147.4 million yuan). The study further identified priority areas for compensation. The study is expected to provide theoretical references for ecological management and compensation in watersheds, as well as strategic pathways for realizing environmental justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114004
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate the ecosystem services supply and demand mismatch in the Luo River Basin?

Xuning Qiao, Hongfei Gao, Yongju Yang, Qiong Zheng et al.
8 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
8.84
article

How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate the ecosystem services supply and demand mismatch in the Luo River Basin?

Xuning Qiao, Hongfei Gao, Yongju Yang, Qiong Zheng, Tongqian Zhao, H Y Zhou, Jinyuan Zhang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• A research framework of “supply / demand-flow-compensation” for ecosystem services was constructed. • Ecosystem service flow pathways are simulated using the breakpoint formula and field strength model. • Ecological compensation optimized using coefficients of natural , economy, society, and Gini. • Priority areas of ecological compensation were identified. The ecological compensation (EC) mechanism is crucial for balancing regional development, enhancing ecosystem services (ESs), and achieving sustainable development goals. However, how to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate the ecosystem service supply and demand mismatch remains unsolved. This study examines the Luo River Basin and applies theories of externalities and environmental justice. The InVEST and spatial analysis models are used to evaluate the supply and demand of four ESs—carbon sequestration (CS), food production (FP), soil retention (SR), and water yield (WY)—from 2000 to 2020. The ecological service flow (ESF) path in the Luo River basin is simulated using the breakpoint formula and field strength model, comprehensively considering terrain and land use resistance. Construct an EC model integrating comprehensive natural differentials, economic levels, and social development coefficients, and prioritize compensation. Employ the Gini coefficient to adjust for distributional equity. There is a mismatch between supply and demand for ESs in the Luo River Basin from 2000 to 2020, with supply services CS, SR, and WY trending downward and FP trending upward. Demand service CS is trending up and FP, SR and WY are trending down. ESF flows weakened with distance and flowed primarily from the southwest to the northeast of the Luo River Basin, with the highest number of service flows in WY. The total EC reaches 393.4 million yuan. Song County receives the highest EC (95.8 million yuan), while Luolong District has the highest compensation payment (147.4 million yuan). The study further identified priority areas for compensation. The study is expected to provide theoretical references for ecological management and compensation in watersheds, as well as strategic pathways for realizing environmental justice.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 178
Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.