3D printed polymer gaskets for custom-form batteries

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes, like 3D printing, help to facilitate complex and customizable battery geometries which can provide design freedom and enhance volumetric energy density within electronic devices. AM materials must have the thermal and mechanical properties that enable printability, and when used in batteries, AM materials must also be chemically and electrochemically compatible with the battery chemistry. The compatibility between AM materials and the battery is of particular importance for the cell packaging materials which must be inert and are often overlooked. This study systematically studies AM-compatible polymeric materials for use as gaskets in lithium-ion cells. The materials investigated include three thermoplastics suitable for material extrusion printing: polylactic acid (PLA), polycarbonate, and polypropylene/polyethylene copolymer (PPPEC); and two photoresins suitable for vat photopolymerization (VPP) printing: an acrylate-based photoresin and a polyethylene glycol diacrylate photoresin. The AM gasket materials were tested in comparison to a conventional commercial polypropylene gasket. Mechanical testing (swell measurements and material stiffness) and electrochemical testing (linear sweep voltammetry and galvanostatic cycling of full cells) demonstrated that PLA and the VPP polymers were the least compatible with the lithium-ion battery chemistry, despite their prevalent use in studies of AM batteries, and that PPPEC was the most compatible. • AM (or 3D printing) can be used to enable customized battery packages. • AM polymer packaging (gaskets) require battery chemistry compatibility. • PC, PLA, and APR soften considerably when exposed to battery solvents. • Common AM-compatible polymers (PLA, APR, PEGDA) are incompatible with batteries. • PPPEC demonstrated the best battery performance while remaining AM-compatible.