Value Engineering in The Selection of Fire Proof Facade Materials for The Transjakarta Bus Stop Building at Roundabout Hi Jakarta

The façade system is a critical element of bus stop structures, serving not only as an aesthetic feature and weather barrier but also as a key component in ensuring fire safety. However, many façade materials used in public facilities still fail to meet fire resistance standards, with some even employing flammable components. In practice, material selection often prioritizes low initial costs over long-term safety and maintenance considerations, increasing the risk of fire hazards and future expenses. This study applies the Value Engineering (VE) approach to optimize the selection of fire-resistant façade materials, balancing cost efficiency, technical performance, and safety. A case study was conducted at the strategically located Bundaran HI TransJakarta Bus Stop, which experiences high passenger traffic and demands a high level of safety. The analysis compared the original façade material—Façade Seven® ACP PE—with two alternatives: Alucobond® A2 (Alternative 1) and Seven® ACP FR (Alternative 2). Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) results show total costs of Rp 5,839,108,944 for the original material, Rp 6,409,735,117 for Alternative 1, and Rp 5,563,289,858 for Alternative 2. The use of Seven® ACP FR yields a 5% cost saving for façade works compared to the original material and reduces total project costs by 0.70%, making it the most economical option. Risk analysis further confirms the superiority of Seven® ACP FR, with LCCA costs reduced from Rp 7,471,223,369.42 to Rp 5,897,558,846.65 after risk mitigation—reflecting a 21.06% saving. These findings highlight the potential of VE to deliver safer, more cost-effective, and sustainable material solutions for public transportation infrastructure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of architecture and civil engineering.
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35629/8193-10088595
Primary Topic
Value Engineering and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value Engineering in The Selection of Fire Proof Facade Materials for The Transjakarta Bus Stop Building at Roundabout Hi Jakarta

Umbu Berthanly Divar
Journal of architecture and civil engineering.
Value Engineering and Management
article

Value Engineering in The Selection of Fire Proof Facade Materials for The Transjakarta Bus Stop Building at Roundabout Hi Jakarta

Umbu Berthanly Divar
article en

Abstract

The façade system is a critical element of bus stop structures, serving not only as an aesthetic feature and weather barrier but also as a key component in ensuring fire safety. However, many façade materials used in public facilities still fail to meet fire resistance standards, with some even employing flammable components. In practice, material selection often prioritizes low initial costs over long-term safety and maintenance considerations, increasing the risk of fire hazards and future expenses. This study applies the Value Engineering (VE) approach to optimize the selection of fire-resistant façade materials, balancing cost efficiency, technical performance, and safety. A case study was conducted at the strategically located Bundaran HI TransJakarta Bus Stop, which experiences high passenger traffic and demands a high level of safety. The analysis compared the original façade material—Façade Seven® ACP PE—with two alternatives: Alucobond® A2 (Alternative 1) and Seven® ACP FR (Alternative 2). Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) results show total costs of Rp 5,839,108,944 for the original material, Rp 6,409,735,117 for Alternative 1, and Rp 5,563,289,858 for Alternative 2. The use of Seven® ACP FR yields a 5% cost saving for façade works compared to the original material and reduces total project costs by 0.70%, making it the most economical option. Risk analysis further confirms the superiority of Seven® ACP FR, with LCCA costs reduced from Rp 7,471,223,369.42 to Rp 5,897,558,846.65 after risk mitigation—reflecting a 21.06% saving. These findings highlight the potential of VE to deliver safer, more cost-effective, and sustainable material solutions for public transportation infrastructure.

Journal of architecture and civil engineering.Vol. 10(8)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Value Engineering and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.