Comparing a Faculty-Created OER and Commercial Textbook: Student Outcomes and Perceptions

This research study compares student outcomes and perceptions in two in-person sections of the same community college business law course: one with the previously used commercial textbook and the other with an open textbook created by the faculty specifically for the course outcomes. The faculty was motivated to create the open textbook to make the course more accessible to students by reducing the course materials cost, by creating the textbook with understandable content for the students, updated examples, and case studies that could be easily updated in the future, and by providing the textbook in multiple formats, including both digital and print, to meet their students’ diverse learning and access needs. Students from both sections were surveyed at the end of the term to learn of their perceptions of the textbooks. Withdrawal rates, course grades, and enrollment intensity the following term were compared for the two sections while accounting for student-level variables including prior GPA, prior college experience, and enrollment intensity that term. There was no significant difference between the two sections in terms of final grades, withdrawals, or enrollment intensity the following term. Neither was there a significant difference in how students rated the usefulness of their textbook, but students in the open textbook section rated their textbook significantly higher in quality than students in the commercial textbook section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Praxis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.897
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing a Faculty-Created OER and Commercial Textbook: Student Outcomes and Perceptions

Jennifer Lantrip, Meagan Button
1 citations
Open Praxis
Open Education and E-Learning
1.69
article

Comparing a Faculty-Created OER and Commercial Textbook: Student Outcomes and Perceptions

Jennifer Lantrip, Meagan Button
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research study compares student outcomes and perceptions in two in-person sections of the same community college business law course: one with the previously used commercial textbook and the other with an open textbook created by the faculty specifically for the course outcomes. The faculty was motivated to create the open textbook to make the course more accessible to students by reducing the course materials cost, by creating the textbook with understandable content for the students, updated examples, and case studies that could be easily updated in the future, and by providing the textbook in multiple formats, including both digital and print, to meet their students’ diverse learning and access needs. Students from both sections were surveyed at the end of the term to learn of their perceptions of the textbooks. Withdrawal rates, course grades, and enrollment intensity the following term were compared for the two sections while accounting for student-level variables including prior GPA, prior college experience, and enrollment intensity that term. There was no significant difference between the two sections in terms of final grades, withdrawals, or enrollment intensity the following term. Neither was there a significant difference in how students rated the usefulness of their textbook, but students in the open textbook section rated their textbook significantly higher in quality than students in the commercial textbook section.

Open PraxisVol. 17(3)
Pacific University (US)
University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Duluth, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Open Education and E-Learning
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.