Effectiveness of repeated rechloramination in recovering chloramine from nitrification

Breakpoint chlorination ("burn") is a common practice to recover chloramine from nitrification. It, however, leads to the formation of a high amount of toxic disinfection by-products and is operationally complex. This study evaluated the effectiveness of repeated (daily) rechloramination at a Cl/N mass ratio of 4.5:1 in a continuously flowing reactor system where nitrification (nitrite, 0.187 mg-N L −1 and chloramine, 0.55 mg-Cl 2 L −1 ) occurred. Repeated (daily) rechloramination with 3 mg-Cl 2 L −1 was more effective than with 2 mg-Cl 2 L −1 in suppressing nitrification (nitrite 0.016 mg-N L −1 ) and bacterial populations (ATP 5 pg.μL −1 ), thus recovering chloramine residuals (1.5 mg L −1 ). This effect was noted within three days of rechloramination and remained stable for the next seven days, after which rechloramination was stopped. Chloramine gradually decreased, and in about ten more days, nitrite started to increase. Chloramine drop was triggered by the incoming water quality -chloramine (1.7 mg-Cl 2 L −1 ), chloramine decaying proteins and microorganisms contributing to the decay coefficient of 0.0143 h −1 . Nitrite in incoming water was < 0.007 mg-N L -1 . Nitrite appeared when the chloramine concentration decreased below the biostable residual concentration (BRC), but it contributed < 15 % to the decay. Therefore, the necessary conditions for successful recovery by repeated rechloramination are: a) ensuring upstream water quality is suitable to maintain chloramine above the BRC after stopping rechloramination, b) selecting a dose that could consistently keep the chloramine above the BRC, and c) a minimal biofilm-affected tank (e.g., surface to volume ratio <1 m −1 ). If a tank or pipe is biofilm-affected, chloramine should be kept above 1.7 mg-Cl 2 L −1 . • Recovery of chloramine from nitrification depends on upstream conditions, rechloramination dose & frequency. • Repeated rechloramination supress the growth of chloramine resistant bacteria. • Biofilm & chloramine decaying proteins are difficult to eliminate by rechloramination. • Chloramine residuals should be > 1.7 mg-Cl 2 .L −1 to supress the biofilm. • Biofilm effect is minimal in full-scale tanks, thus quicker recovery and long-lasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.118651
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of repeated rechloramination in recovering chloramine from nitrification

N.B. Karthik, Arumugam Sathasivan, Bal Krishna K C
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Water Treatment and Disinfection
article

Effectiveness of repeated rechloramination in recovering chloramine from nitrification

N.B. Karthik, Arumugam Sathasivan, Bal Krishna K C
article en

Abstract

Breakpoint chlorination ("burn") is a common practice to recover chloramine from nitrification. It, however, leads to the formation of a high amount of toxic disinfection by-products and is operationally complex. This study evaluated the effectiveness of repeated (daily) rechloramination at a Cl/N mass ratio of 4.5:1 in a continuously flowing reactor system where nitrification (nitrite, 0.187 mg-N L −1 and chloramine, 0.55 mg-Cl 2 L −1 ) occurred. Repeated (daily) rechloramination with 3 mg-Cl 2 L −1 was more effective than with 2 mg-Cl 2 L −1 in suppressing nitrification (nitrite 0.016 mg-N L −1 ) and bacterial populations (ATP 5 pg.μL −1 ), thus recovering chloramine residuals (1.5 mg L −1 ). This effect was noted within three days of rechloramination and remained stable for the next seven days, after which rechloramination was stopped. Chloramine gradually decreased, and in about ten more days, nitrite started to increase. Chloramine drop was triggered by the incoming water quality -chloramine (1.7 mg-Cl 2 L −1 ), chloramine decaying proteins and microorganisms contributing to the decay coefficient of 0.0143 h −1 . Nitrite in incoming water was < 0.007 mg-N L -1 . Nitrite appeared when the chloramine concentration decreased below the biostable residual concentration (BRC), but it contributed < 15 % to the decay. Therefore, the necessary conditions for successful recovery by repeated rechloramination are: a) ensuring upstream water quality is suitable to maintain chloramine above the BRC after stopping rechloramination, b) selecting a dose that could consistently keep the chloramine above the BRC, and c) a minimal biofilm-affected tank (e.g., surface to volume ratio <1 m −1 ). If a tank or pipe is biofilm-affected, chloramine should be kept above 1.7 mg-Cl 2 L −1 . • Recovery of chloramine from nitrification depends on upstream conditions, rechloramination dose & frequency. • Repeated rechloramination supress the growth of chloramine resistant bacteria. • Biofilm & chloramine decaying proteins are difficult to eliminate by rechloramination. • Chloramine residuals should be > 1.7 mg-Cl 2 .L −1 to supress the biofilm. • Biofilm effect is minimal in full-scale tanks, thus quicker recovery and long-lasting.

Journal of environmental chemical engineeringVol. 13(5)
Western Sydney University (AU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.