Now more than ever: the role of museum and archival objects in an age of generative artificial intelligence

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that in a era of deepfakes, generative artificial intelligence (AI) and misinformation, physical objects in museum and archival collections gain renewed significance as anchors of truth and authenticity. As trust in traditional authorities declines and digital content becomes easier to manipulate, the tangible, verifiable nature of real objects offers a crucial counterbalance. Unlike digital media, objects allow for direct, multi-sensory engagement and possess unique ontic features – such as wear, residue and modifications – that affirm their provenance. Their authenticity can be confirmed through documentation, eyewitness accounts and scientific methods. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a deliberation, examining the interface between diminishment in museum authority, a rise in alternative “truths” and the emergence of deep fakes in the age of generative AI. Findings Museums, as custodians of these artefacts, play a vital role in sustaining credible historical narratives, particularly as conspiracy theories may increasingly target lesser-known items with unclear histories. To safeguard collections, institutions must adopt robust documentation standards – such as blockchain-secured metadata, forensic-style photographic records and transparent curatorial histories. Though resource-intensive, these measures help protect against future challenges to authenticity and bolster public trust. Museums must also embrace an expanded educational role, equipping visitors to critically navigate the digital misinformation landscape and appreciate the evidentiary value of authentic objects. As younger, AI-native generations gravitate toward digital experiences, well-documented duplicates may offer vital opportunities for tactile engagement. Originality/value The content of the paper reaffirms the centrality of tangible objects in museum holdings. It argues that the enduring value of museums depends on their ability to adapt, remain transparent and preserve physical evidence of the past in a world increasingly shaped by digital illusions and contested truths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collection and Curation
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-04-2025-0020
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Now more than ever: the role of museum and archival objects in an age of generative artificial intelligence

Dirk Spennemann
Collection and Curation
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

Now more than ever: the role of museum and archival objects in an age of generative artificial intelligence

Dirk Spennemann
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that in a era of deepfakes, generative artificial intelligence (AI) and misinformation, physical objects in museum and archival collections gain renewed significance as anchors of truth and authenticity. As trust in traditional authorities declines and digital content becomes easier to manipulate, the tangible, verifiable nature of real objects offers a crucial counterbalance. Unlike digital media, objects allow for direct, multi-sensory engagement and possess unique ontic features – such as wear, residue and modifications – that affirm their provenance. Their authenticity can be confirmed through documentation, eyewitness accounts and scientific methods. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a deliberation, examining the interface between diminishment in museum authority, a rise in alternative “truths” and the emergence of deep fakes in the age of generative AI. Findings Museums, as custodians of these artefacts, play a vital role in sustaining credible historical narratives, particularly as conspiracy theories may increasingly target lesser-known items with unclear histories. To safeguard collections, institutions must adopt robust documentation standards – such as blockchain-secured metadata, forensic-style photographic records and transparent curatorial histories. Though resource-intensive, these measures help protect against future challenges to authenticity and bolster public trust. Museums must also embrace an expanded educational role, equipping visitors to critically navigate the digital misinformation landscape and appreciate the evidentiary value of authentic objects. As younger, AI-native generations gravitate toward digital experiences, well-documented duplicates may offer vital opportunities for tactile engagement. Originality/value The content of the paper reaffirms the centrality of tangible objects in museum holdings. It argues that the enduring value of museums depends on their ability to adapt, remain transparent and preserve physical evidence of the past in a world increasingly shaped by digital illusions and contested truths.

Collection and CurationVol. 45(1)
Albury Wodonga Health (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.