A Mixed-Methods Study of Public Understanding of Scientific Uncertainty
Scientific uncertainty has long posed challenges for science communication and research. There is a need to better understand how non-expert publics conceptualize scientific uncertainty and how to reliably and validly measure public understanding of scientific uncertainty. We address this need using a mixed-methods approach. In Study 1 we conducted a series of focus groups to explore how non-expert publics conceptualize scientific uncertainty and identified three themes related to process, contexts, and impacts. In Study 2 we developed and validated a new 9-item survey scale to measure public understanding of scientific uncertainty (PUSU).
Authors
- Becca Beets (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-1281)
- Dominique Brossard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-8388)
- Dietram A. Scheufele (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-5407)
Institutions
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Morgridge Institute for Research (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science Communication
- Published
- 2025-06-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251348142
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.20