THE PREDICTABILITY OF TYPES OF MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS ON THE PERCEIVED RETENTION STATUS AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF COLLEGE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

The purpose of this study was to examine the predictability of types of mentoring relationships on the perceived academic success and retention status of undergraduate students from two historically Black colleges and universities. Specifically, this study focused on the predictable relationship between types of mentoring relationships, such as peer mentorship, faculty mentorship, e-mentorship, and group mentorship, on the perceived academic success and retention status of undergraduate students. A correlational multiple regression design was used in this study. Two hundred and sixty (260) undergraduate students were selected to participate in the study. An instrument entitled Undergraduates’ Perception of Performance Behavior Survey was used to collect data in this study. This instrument was found to have excellent content validity from a group of experts in the field of higher education. An alpha coefficient of .85 was computed for the instrument. Furthermore, the data were tested utilizing the Standard Multiple Regression Technique. The data revealed that types of mentorship relationships did have some predictive validity regarding perceived retention status and academic success.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education and Social Science Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2025.8412
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PREDICTABILITY OF TYPES OF MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS ON THE PERCEIVED RETENTION STATUS AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF COLLEGE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Dominic Thomas, J.S. Lindsey, Michelle Y. Martin, Robert Davis et al.
International Journal of Education and Social Science Research
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

THE PREDICTABILITY OF TYPES OF MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS ON THE PERCEIVED RETENTION STATUS AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF COLLEGE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Dominic Thomas, J.S. Lindsey, Michelle Y. Martin, Robert Davis, Abba Giza, Oreoluwa Ladoja, Geraldine Doucet, Antonio Pegues
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the predictability of types of mentoring relationships on the perceived academic success and retention status of undergraduate students from two historically Black colleges and universities. Specifically, this study focused on the predictable relationship between types of mentoring relationships, such as peer mentorship, faculty mentorship, e-mentorship, and group mentorship, on the perceived academic success and retention status of undergraduate students. A correlational multiple regression design was used in this study. Two hundred and sixty (260) undergraduate students were selected to participate in the study. An instrument entitled Undergraduates’ Perception of Performance Behavior Survey was used to collect data in this study. This instrument was found to have excellent content validity from a group of experts in the field of higher education. An alpha coefficient of .85 was computed for the instrument. Furthermore, the data were tested utilizing the Standard Multiple Regression Technique. The data revealed that types of mentorship relationships did have some predictive validity regarding perceived retention status and academic success.

International Journal of Education and Social Science ResearchVol. 08(04)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.